How to find the equivalent resistance of this infinite circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zenterix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electric circuits
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the equivalent resistance of an infinite ladder circuit as part of the MIT OCW course 6.002 "Circuits and Electronics." The derived formula for the equivalent resistance is given by the quadratic equation \(R_{eq}^2 - RR_{eq} - R^2 = 0\), leading to the solution \(R_{eq} = R \frac{1 + \sqrt{5}}{2}\). The negative solution is dismissed as non-physical, confirming that only the positive value is valid. The discussion also references the concept of infinite ladders and their insensitivity to far-end resistance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic circuit theory and Ohm's Law
  • Familiarity with quadratic equations and their solutions
  • Knowledge of infinite series and their applications in electrical circuits
  • Experience with MIT OCW course materials, specifically 6.002 "Circuits and Electronics"
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of equivalent resistance in infinite ladder circuits
  • Learn about the golden ratio and its relevance in circuit analysis
  • Explore the concept of continued fractions in electrical engineering
  • Review the application of quadratic equations in circuit analysis problems
USEFUL FOR

Students of electrical engineering, circuit designers, and anyone interested in advanced circuit analysis techniques, particularly those studying infinite networks and equivalent resistance calculations.

zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
TL;DR Summary: I am following the course 6.002 "Circuit and Electronics" on MIT OCW. There are no solutions to the problem sets. I would like to check my solution to one particular problem.

We are asked to find the equivalent resistance of the network

1695598655023.png

as viewed from its ports.

I simplified the network as

1695598932640.png

Where ##R_{eq}## is not only the equivalent resistance of the branch shown above, it is also the equivalent resistance of the entire network shown above (because the network shown above repeats itself infinitely).

Then

$$R_{eq}=R+\frac{R_{eq}R}{R+R_{eq}}$$

$$R_{eq}(R+R_{eq})=R(R+R_{eq})+RR_{eq}$$

$$R_{eq}^2=R^2+RR_{eq}$$

$$R_{eq}^2-RR_{eq}-R^2=0$$

$$\Delta = R^2+4R^2=5R^2$$

$$R_{eq}=\frac{R\pm R\sqrt{5}}{2}$$

$$=R\frac{1\pm\sqrt{5}}{2}$$

Is this result correct?

Here is the problem set in full if it is useful.
 
  • Like
Likes Sat-P and Babadag
Physics news on Phys.org
zenterix said:
TL;DR Summary: I am following the course 6.002 "Circuit and Electronics" on MIT OCW. There are no solutions to the problem sets. I would like to check my solution to one particular problem.

We are asked to find the equivalent resistance of the network

View attachment 332529
as viewed from its ports.

I simplified the network as

View attachment 332530
Where ##R_{eq}## is not only the equivalent resistance of the branch shown above, it is also the equivalent resistance of the entire network shown above (because the network shown above repeats itself infinitely).Here is the problem set in full if it is useful.
Seems like a clear approach. If your algebra is correct I'd say you have it correct.
 
##R=\frac{1-\sqrt{5}}{2}## certainly isn't correct.

Have you checked your own work? How would you use that (positive) value to check?
 
Your approach is fine. I think the circuit you want is the one shown below in which the resistance between points A and B is to be found is clearer about what you are replacing with what in view of the drawing provided by the problem.

InfiniteLadder.png
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics
Note that: (1±√5)/2 ; is the golden ratio, or its reciprocal.

An infinite ladder can be written as an infinite recurring continued fraction, and solved in the same equivalent way.
 
Babadag said:
According to (Endreny 1967)

Endrenyi, J., “Analysis of transmission tower potentials during ground faults" for a transmission line R1∞=R/2+sqrt(R^2+R^2/4)
If not already clear, note that "R/2+sqrt(R^2+R^2/4)" simplifies to ##R \frac {1+\sqrt 5}2##.
 
The second addend in the expression ## R _ { eq } = R \frac { 1 } { 2 } + ( \pm R \frac { \sqrt 5 } { 2 } ) ## is resistance and must be positive. This is why ## R _ { eq } = R \frac { 1 + \sqrt 5 } { 2 } ## is the only acceptable solution.
 
zenterix said:
TL;DR Summary: I am following the course 6.002 "Circuit and Electronics" on MIT OCW. There are no solutions to the problem sets. I would like to check my solution to one particular problem.

We are asked to find the equivalent resistance of the network

View attachment 332529
as viewed from its ports.

I simplified the network as

View attachment 332530
Where ##R_{eq}## is not only the equivalent resistance of the branch shown above, it is also the equivalent resistance of the entire network shown above (because the network shown above repeats itself infinitely).

Then

$$R_{eq}=R+\frac{R_{eq}R}{R+R_{eq}}$$

$$R_{eq}(R+R_{eq})=R(R+R_{eq})+RR_{eq}$$

$$R_{eq}^2=R^2+RR_{eq}$$

$$R_{eq}^2-RR_{eq}-R^2=0$$

$$\Delta = R^2+4R^2=5R^2$$

$$R_{eq}=\frac{R\pm R\sqrt{5}}{2}$$

$$=R\frac{1\pm\sqrt{5}}{2}$$

Is this result correct?

Here is the problem set in full if it is useful.
It is indeed but the answer can't be in negative so + one is right
 
  • #10
Try puting R adjacent to 2R and 4R then 8R and so on , of resitance increases by a factor of two parallely till infinity. It is a must try
 
  • #11
An infinite ladder is insensitive to the far end resistance, because that approximation is attenuated by the intermediate ladder.
Guess a far end value, say 1.5 ohms.
Then repeatedly take the reciprocal, and add one, until you get a stable value.
Solve; x = 1 + 1/x ; and you get the golden ratio = 1.618033
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
893
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K