How to find the inverse of a given matrix?

  • Thread starter Thread starter haha1234
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse
Click For Summary
To find the inverse of a given matrix, it is essential to understand the use of elementary matrices and row operations. The discussion highlights the process of transforming one matrix into another using specific row operations, which can be represented by elementary matrices. An example provided involves converting matrix A_1 to A_2 through a combination of row operations, specifically adding a multiple of one row to another. The correct elementary matrix is derived by applying the same row operation to the identity matrix. Understanding these concepts is crucial for successfully finding the inverse of a matrix.
haha1234
Messages
109
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem is posted below.

Homework Equations


In part b,I think I can use E1E2...A=I this property.
But I cannot find the answer.

The Attempt at a Solution


By using the property,I multiply the inverse giving with σ2and σ1.
However,the answer is not correct!
So how to get the correct answer?
Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • 20151015_192257[1].jpg
    20151015_192257[1].jpg
    37 KB · Views: 416
Physics news on Phys.org
My neck hurts. Doesn't it say something in the guidelines about posting pictures ?
 
It's not that hard to type in the matrix itself. Also, if you know the basic definitions, you should not have much difficulty deciding what elementary matrices are used. For example, we are given the matrix,
A_1= \begin{bmatrix}1 & 2 & 1 \\ 2 & 5 & 4 \\ 0 & -1 & -3 \end{bmatrix}
and are asked what elementary matrix, \sigma_1 converts that to
A_2= \begin{bmatrix}1 & 2 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 & 2 \\ 0 & -1 & -3 \end{bmatrix}

There are three kinds of row operations:
1) multiply every number in a single row by a number
2) swap two rows
3) add a multiple of one row to another
Comparing A_1 and A_2, we see that rows 1 and 2 have not changed so we have not swapped two rows. The second row has changed from [2 5 4] to [0 1 2]. If we were multiplying by a number, to go from "2" to "0" we would have to multiply by 0 but then we would have "0" in all positions so the row operation was not multiplying by a number. And since the first number in the last row is 0, adding any multiple of that row to the second row would not have changed that number. So the new second row must be [2 5 4] plus a multiple of [1 2 1]. To go from 2 to 0, we must have subtracted 2 which is the same as adding -2 times 1. Adding -2 times 2 to 5 gives 1 and adding -2 times 1 to 4 gives 2. That is exactly what we wanted. So the row operation must be "add -2 times each number in the first row to the corresponding number in the second row".

To get the elementary matrix that gives that, do that row operation to the identity matrix. Adding -2 times each member in the first row to the corresponding number in the second row of the identity matrix gives
\begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 \\ -2 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}
That is the elementary matrix \sigma_1.

Now, continue like that
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
HallsofIvy said:
It's not that hard to type in the matrix itself. Also, if you know the basic definitions, you should not have much difficulty deciding what elementary matrices are used. For example, we are given the matrix,
A_1= \begin{bmatrix}1 & 2 & 1 \\ 2 & 5 & 4 \\ 0 & -1 & -3 \end{bmatrix}
and are asked what elementary matrix, \sigma_1 converts that to
A_2= \begin{bmatrix}1 & 2 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 & 2 \\ 0 & -1 & -3 \end{bmatrix}

There are three kinds of row operations:
1) multiply every number in a single row by a number
2) swap two rows
3) add a multiple of one row to another
Comparing A_1 and A_2, we see that rows 1 and 2 have not changed so we have not swapped two rows. The second row has changed from [2 5 4] to [0 1 2]. If we were multiplying by a number, to go from "2" to "0" we would have to multiply by 0 but then we would have "0" in all positions so the row operation was not multiplying by a number. And since the first number in the last row is 0, adding any multiple of that row to the second row would not have changed that number. So the new second row must be [2 5 4] plus a multiple of [1 2 1]. To go from 2 to 0, we must have subtracted 2 which is the same as adding -2 times 1. Adding -2 times 2 to 5 gives 1 and adding -2 times 1 to 4 gives 2. That is exactly what we wanted. So the row operation must be "add -2 times each number in the first row to the corresponding number in the second row".

To get the elementary matrix that gives that, do that row operation to the identity matrix. Adding -2 times each member in the first row to the corresponding number in the second row of the identity matrix gives
\begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 \\ -2 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}
That is the elementary matrix \sigma_1.

Now, continue like that
...I know how to find the corresponding elementary matrix,but I don't know how to find the inverse using the A-1:frown:
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K