How to find the length of the wire?

In summary: Generally we don't talk about the two 'wires'. This radiator is called a "half wave dipole" because its overall length is half a wavelength. The current is supplied at the centre, so there is a gap there and each side is then 1/4 λ. For small wavelengths the wires are usually rigid metal tubes (often...usually...copper), but for larger wavelengths they are more likely to be flexible fibres.
  • #1
lulu
5
0

Homework Statement


For a 150 MHz (1 MHz=1 million cycles per second) radio signal, the wavelength is 2 m long. If each wire is about 0.5 m long, a half wavelength of radiation will span the two wires taken as one. The result is that electromagnetic waves are generated in the direction of the arrow, moving away from the transmitter at the speed of light.

Homework Equations


To transmit radiation of wavelength 1, how long should each wire be in multiples of (or fraction of) 1?

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure if this is the answer, but I was thinking the length of the wire could be 0.25m if the wavelength is 1? I don't really understand though, could someone help please? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'd agree with your answer.
How did you decide on that?
 
  • #3
lulu said:

Homework Statement


For a 150 MHz (1 MHz=1 million cycles per second) radio signal, the wavelength is 2 m long. If each wire is about 0.5 m long, a half wavelength of radiation will span the two wires taken as one. The result is that electromagnetic waves are generated in the direction of the arrow, moving away from the transmitter at the speed of light.

Homework Equations


To transmit radiation of wavelength 1, how long should each wire be in multiples of (or fraction of) 1?

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure if this is the answer, but I was thinking the length of the wire could be 0.25m if the wavelength is 1? I don't really understand though, could someone help please? Thanks.
Welcome to the PF.

Could you use the Upload button (in the lower right of the Reply window) to upload a PDF or JPEG of the figure that goes with this problem? I'm having trouble understanding the problem statement. Thanks. :smile:
 
  • #4
berkeman said:
Welcome to the PF.

Could you use the Upload button (in the lower right of the Reply window) to upload a PDF or JPEG of the figure that goes with this problem? I'm having trouble understanding the problem statement. Thanks. :smile:

Thanks, this was the only photo that was given to refer to.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-01-31 at 10.11.09 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-01-31 at 10.11.09 PM.png
    12.7 KB · Views: 497
  • #5
Merlin3189 said:
I'd agree with your answer.
How did you decide on that?

Thanks for replying. I'm not sure if I'm thinking about this correctly but I thought of it as a proportion problem. 0.5/2= x/1; so x=0.25.
 
  • #6
lulu said:
Thanks, this was the only photo that was given to refer to.
So it's a typical half-wave dipole antenna (2x Quarter Wave elements).
lulu said:

Homework Statement


For a 150 MHz (1 MHz=1 million cycles per second) radio signal, the wavelength is 2 m long. If each wire is about 0.5 m long, a half wavelength of radiation will span the two wires taken as one. The result is that electromagnetic waves are generated in the direction of the arrow, moving away from the transmitter at the speed of light.

Homework Equations


To transmit radiation of wavelength 1, how long should each wire be in multiples of (or fraction of) 1?

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure if this is the answer, but I was thinking the length of the wire could be 0.25m if the wavelength is 1? I don't really understand though, could someone help please? Thanks.
So what is the issue? At 150MHz the wavelength is 2m. A quarter wavelength is 0.5m, so it takes two of those elements to make a dipole. Where did 0.25m come from? Sorry if I'm missing something...
 
  • #7
berkeman said:
So it's a typical half-wave dipole antenna (2x Quarter Wave elements).

So what is the issue? At 150MHz the wavelength is 2m. A quarter wavelength is 0.5m, so it takes two of those elements to make a dipole. Where did 0.25m come from? Sorry if I'm missing something...

So I'm trying to figure out what the length of the wire is if the wavelength is 1.
I wasn't sure how to approach it so I just did this: 0.5/2= x/1; so x=0.25
 
  • #8
lulu said:
So I'm trying to figure out what the length of the wire is if the wavelength is 1.
One what? Please include units. Thanks.
 
  • #9
Ah, sorry. I think I misread the question! I get the question now.
Thanks for your help!
 
  • #10
Proportion is completely valid for this topic. That is what I meant when I asked how you got your answer.
The radiator is half a wavelength and the individual 'wires' are each a quarter wavelength. So when the frequency is doubled, the wavelength is halved and all other linear measuements are halved.

Generally we don't talk about the two 'wires'. This radiator is called a "half wave dipole" because its overall length is half a wavelength. The current is supplied at the centre, so there is a gap there and each side is then 1/4 λ.
For small wavelengths the wires are usually rigid metal tubes (often aluminium) such as you may see as radio or TV antennae on houses. (They also have extra tubes as well as the dipole.)

Incidentally, the diagram shows the radiation at right angles to the wires, which is correct. But that also means down, towards you, away from you and at any direction which is at right angles to the wires.at right angles. Also this is merely the direction of maximum radiation. There is also some radiation at other angles. The only direction in which there should be no radiation is directly in line with the wires. (Maybe too much info for now. Just that on PF we do try to be correct.)

As berkeman says, normally give units with your measurements - it avoids confusion, both for us and more importantly for you.
Here, because it is a question of proportion, you could reasonably give answers without units (as in post #7.) If the wavelength is 1 then the 'wires' are 0.25 and it does not matter whether we mean 1m and 0.25m or 1ft and 0.25ft or 1dm and 0.25dm or 1 perch and 0.25 perch, etc. so long as the units are the same.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman

1. How do you measure the length of a wire?

The length of a wire can be measured using a ruler or measuring tape. Simply place the wire along the length of the ruler or tape and read the measurement at the end of the wire.

2. Can you use a scale to measure the length of a wire?

No, a scale is not an accurate tool for measuring the length of a wire as it is meant for measuring weight, not distance.

3. Is there a formula for finding the length of a wire?

Yes, the formula for finding the length of a wire is length = resistance x cross-sectional area / conductivity. However, this formula is only applicable for calculating the length of a wire with known resistance, cross-sectional area, and conductivity values.

4. How do you find the length of a wire if it is not a straight line?

If the wire is not a straight line, you can use a flexible measuring tape or string to measure the wire's length. Simply follow the wire's curves and bends and measure the total length using the tape or string.

5. Are there any other methods for finding the length of a wire?

Yes, there are other methods for finding the length of a wire, such as using a laser distance measurer or a digital caliper. These tools may provide more accurate measurements, especially for wires with intricate shapes or bends.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
20
Views
639
Back
Top