How to find the velocity of a wave in simple harmonic motion given time

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the velocity of a wave in simple harmonic motion at 0.12 seconds using the correct formulas. The initial formula used, v = ω * xmax * cos(ωt), is inappropriate because it predicts maximum velocity at t = 0, which contradicts the graph showing maximum displacement at that time. The correct approach involves using the formula v = ω * sqrt(xmax² - x²) after determining the displacement at t = 0.12 seconds, confirming the need to differentiate between displacement and velocity formulas in simple harmonic motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simple harmonic motion principles
  • Familiarity with wave mechanics and velocity calculations
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, specifically sine and cosine
  • Ability to differentiate functions with respect to time
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to derive displacement equations for simple harmonic motion
  • Study the relationship between displacement and velocity in wave mechanics
  • Explore the significance of phase shifts in trigonometric functions
  • Investigate the mathematical derivation of wave velocity formulas
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focused on wave mechanics and simple harmonic motion, as well as anyone seeking to clarify the distinction between displacement and velocity in oscillatory systems.

MattDutra123
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Find the speed of this longitudinal wave at t=0.12s.
Relevant Equations
v=w*xmax*cos(wt)
The graph provided is below. The problem asks for the speed of the wave at 0.12s. I used the formula v=w*xmax*cos(wt), provided in our textbook where xmax is the amplitude of 2 cm, w (omega) is 2pi divided by the period of 0.2. However, for some reason this formula doesn't give me the correct result. Instead, the solution to the problem involves the formula w*sqrt(xmax^2-x^2), which requires us to first find the displacement at t = 0.12.

My question is: why does the formula I used not work? Why must we use the other formula to solve this problem? I apologise for the bad formatting of the formulas.
243757
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It doesn't work because it's the wrong formula to use. It predicts that the velocity is maximum at t = 0. If you look at the graph, the position is maximum at t = 0 which means that the speed is zero at t = 0.

Also, is this a wave or a simple harmonic oscillator? I think the latter.
 
  • Like
Likes MattDutra123
kuruman said:
It doesn't work because it's the wrong formula. It predicts that the velocity is maximum at t = 0. If you look at the graph, the position is maximum at t = 0 which means that the speed is zero at t = 0.

Also, is this a wave or a simple harmonic oscillator? I think the latter.
Why does the formula I used predict that velocity is maximum at t=0?
If I use the same formula but replacing cos with sin, I get the correct answer. Why is that? Is it related to what you said? We were taught to use cos when displacement is maximum at t = 0, and sine when displacement is 0 at t = 0. Is this correct?
 
You wrote
##v(t)=\omega~ x_{max}\cos(\omega~t)##
At ##t = 0##, ##v(0)=\omega~ x_{max}\cos(0)=\omega~ x_{max}(1)\neq 0.##
Try this
1. Find an expression for ##x(t)## consistent with the graph. Hint: As indicated above, ##x_{max}\cos(0)=x_{max}.##
2. Take the derivative with respect to time to find ##v(t)##. The result should answer your second question.
3. Evaluate ##v(t=0.12~s).## This method is neater and there is no need to do what the solution suggests.

MattDutra123 said:
We were taught to use cos when displacement is maximum at t = 0, and sine when displacement is 0 at t = 0. Is this correct?
That is correct. Your mistake was that you used cos for the velocity; you were taught to use cos for the displacement.
 
  • Like
Likes MattDutra123
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K