How to Find Unit Tangential Vectors on a Surface?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter caseyjay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Surface Vector
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding unit tangential vectors on the surface defined by the equation x² + 3y² + 2z² = 9 at the point (-1, 0, 2). The normal vector is calculated as ∇f(x, y, z) = 2x i + 6y j + 4z k, leading to the tangent plane equation -2x + 8z = 18. The position vector for points in the tangent plane is expressed as r = (x + 1)i + yj + (z - 2)k. The unit tangential vector is obtained by normalizing the tangential vector derived from this position vector.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus and gradient vectors
  • Familiarity with the concept of tangent planes in multivariable calculus
  • Knowledge of unit vectors and vector normalization
  • Ability to perform dot products and solve equations involving vectors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of tangent planes in multivariable calculus
  • Learn about the gradient vector and its applications in optimization
  • Explore vector normalization techniques and their significance in physics
  • Investigate the implications of the dot product in determining orthogonality of vectors
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with vector calculus, particularly those interested in surface analysis and tangential vector calculations.

caseyjay
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

If I have a surface x2+3y2+2z2=9, how am I suppose to find all the unit magnitude vectors that are tangential to the surface at point (-1,0,9)?

So far, I am able to find the normal vector 2xi+6yj+4zk and the equation of the plane at (-1,0,9) will therefore be 2x+6y+4z=6. However, then I am stuck and I do not know how can I find the unit magnitude vectors that are tangential to the surface.

Can someone please help me?

Thanks in advance.

Casey.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are almost finished. All tangential vectors must lie in that tangent plane, of course. The "position vector" of a point in that plane can be written \vec{r}= (x+ 1)\vec{i}+ y\vec{j}+ (z-9)\vec{k} and must satisfy 2(x+1)+ 6y+ 4(z- 9)= 0
You can write, then, z- 9= (1/2)(x+1)+ (3/2)y so the vector equation becomes \vec{r(x,y)}= (x+1)\vec{i}+ y\vec{j}+ (1/2)(x+ 3y+ 1)\vec{k}. Divide that by its length to get a unit vector. Of course, you will have x and y in that because you have a two parameter set of vectors in the tangent plane. You could use the "unit" condition (x+1)^2+ y^2+ (1/4)(x+ 3y+1)= 1 to reduce to one parameter.


While wr
 
HallsofIvy said:
You are almost finished. All tangential vectors must lie in that tangent plane, of course. The "position vector" of a point in that plane can be written \vec{r}= (x+ 1)\vec{i}+ y\vec{j}+ (z-9)\vec{k} and must satisfy 2(x+1)+ 6y+ 4(z- 9)= 0
You can write, then, z- 9= (1/2)(x+1)+ (3/2)y so the vector equation becomes \vec{r(x,y)}= (x+1)\vec{i}+ y\vec{j}+ (1/2)(x+ 3y+ 1)\vec{k}. Divide that by its length to get a unit vector. Of course, you will have x and y in that because you have a two parameter set of vectors in the tangent plane. You could use the "unit" condition (x+1)^2+ y^2+ (1/4)(x+ 3y+1)= 1 to reduce to one parameter.


While wr

Hi HallsofIvy, thanks for your help. At the end of your message, you wrote "While wr". Is there something you would like to continue to explain to me?
 
Actually, no. I started to say "while writing that", it had occurred to m that it would be better to work with the angle the vector makes as parameter but then I figured I had better think about it more! If you let x= cos(\theta) and y= sin(\theta), we can use z= (1/2)(x+1)+ (3/2)y so write z as a function of \theta but then we have the same problem: taking r in the xy-plane equal to 1 doesn't make this a unit vector!
 
HallsofIvy said:
Actually, no. I started to say "while writing that", it had occurred to m that it would be better to work with the angle the vector makes as parameter but then I figured I had better think about it more! If you let x= cos(\theta) and y= sin(\theta), we can use z= (1/2)(x+1)+ (3/2)y so write z as a function of \theta but then we have the same problem: taking r in the xy-plane equal to 1 doesn't make this a unit vector!

Oh I see. Speaking of that, how do you derive that the position vector of a point in that plane can be written as:

<br /> \vec{r}= (x+ 1)\vec{i}+ y\vec{j}+ (z-9)\vec{k}<br />

Is there a formula or derivation that I am missing here?
 
Hi HallsofIvy,

I figure out how you derive \vec{r}= (x+ 1)\vec{i}+ y\vec{j}+ (z-9)\vec{k} as the tangential vectors. Since x, y, and z must satisfy 2(x+1)+ 6y+ 4(z- 9)= 0, two possibilities of the tangent vectors are \vec{r}= \vec{i}+ 3\vec{j}-5\vec{k} at (0,3,4) and \vec{r}= 3\vec{i}+ 5\vec{j}-9\vec{k} at (2,5,0).

Since if I substitute (0,3,4) and (2,5,0) separately into 2(x+1)+ 6y+ 4(z- 9), I will obtain 0, hence I presume I am right so far. However, I also remember that the scalar product of the normal vector and the tangent vector should be equal to zero since the angle between them is 90 degrees. But if I perform

(\vec{i}+ 3\vec{j}-5\vec{k})*(-2\vec{i}+ 0\vec{j}+36\vec{k})

and

(3\vec{i}+ 5\vec{j}-9\vec{k})*(-2\vec{i}+ 0\vec{j}+36\vec{k})

I won't get 0 as a result.

Why is it so?

NB: * is dot product.
 
Hi all,

I think I have solved the problem and thanks for all your help. I have made some fundamental mistakes earlier and hence I am unable to solve it correctly. The solution is as follows:

Surface: x2+3y2+2z2=9

Let f(x,y,z)=x2+3y2+2z2

Therefore \nablaf(x,y,z)=2x\vec{i}+6y\vec{j}+4z\vec{k}.

At (-1,0,2), f(x,y,z)=-2\vec{i}+8\vec{k}. It follows that the equation of the tangent plane is -2(x+1)+8(z-2)=0 and therefore -2x+8z=18.

The tangential vectors on the tangent plane is given by [since it crosses (-1,0,2)]:
(x+1)\vec{i}+y\vec{j}+(z-2)\vec{k}

The unit tangential vector is by dividing the tangential vector with its magnitude.

Hope the above helps and once again thank you to all who have helped in solving this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K