How to find when an eigenbasis

  • Thread starter Thread starter brinethery
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the conditions for the existence of an eigenbasis for a 3x3 matrix, including the relationship between eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Participants explore the characteristic equation and its implications for determining eigenbasis existence.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster seeks clarification on how to determine if an eigenbasis exists for a given matrix, expressing confusion over the topic. Some participants discuss the characteristic equation and the implications of distinct and repeated eigenvalues on the existence of eigenvectors.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the topic, with some providing detailed explanations about eigenvalues and their multiplicities. There is acknowledgment of the complexity involved in understanding the relationship between algebraic and geometric multiplicities, and the discussion remains open with various interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses a need for examples and clarification, indicating a struggle with the material. There is mention of upcoming exams, suggesting a time constraint that may affect the depth of understanding.

brinethery
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
This is a general question because I don't seem to be getting a straight answer from my textbook. I know how to find eigenvalues/vectors, but finding IF an eigenbasis exists is what is throwing me off.

Can someone give me an example of, say, a 3x3 matrix and go through the procedure of finding if the basis exists and then how to find it?

I know this is probably asking a lot, but I am confused!

Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind, I feel dumb for posting the question! I found some examples :-)
 
Consider the characteristic equation det(A-λI)=0.

It factors in ℂ as (λ-a)(λ-b)(λ-c)=0.

If a,b,c are distinct and real, then you have an eigenbasis.

If a,b,c are distinct, but b and c are complex conjugates, then a has an eigenvector, while b and c have complex [STRIKE]eignevalues[/STRIKE] eigenvectors, which are commonly adjusted so that A is the rotation of some plane orthogonal to the eigenvector of a.

If a is disticinct from b=c, then a has an eigenvector, while b=c has either one or two eigenvectors. If it has one, than there is something called a generalized eigenvector, which you might read about that, and the jordan form, which is a generalization of diagonalizing a matrix.

If a=b=c, then there are either 1, 2 or 3 eigenvectors, and respectively either 2, 1, or 0 generalized eigenvectors.

An example of a matrix with 1 eigenvalue and 3 eigenvectors is the identity matrix.

I=(1,0,0)(0,1,0)(0,0,1)

An example of a matrix with 1 eigenvalue and only 1 eigenvector is

A=(1,1,0)(0,1,1)(0,0,1)

Proof is left as an exercise for the reader.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for your detailed reply. This is helping a lot.
 
Just making sure of this, but... we need to make sure that the multiplicity of the eigenvalue (if only one) equals n of I_n.

I'm doing some late-night studying, catching up so hopefully I can pass my exam on Wednesday. I hope I can learn to like linear algebra after this class is over. I'm aware of its many applications in engineering, statistics, etc.
 
In the charactersitic equation, each eigenvalue will have an algebraic mulitplicity (i.e.(λ-a)k). An eignevalues algebraic multiplicity is at least as large as its geometirc multiplicity (the number of eigen vectors it has (or the dimension of its eigenspace) (alg≥geom)). If the algebraic is not equal to the geometric (alg>geom), then some call this degeneracy. You can "fix" this degeneracy by finding generalized eigenvectors, which are not strictly speaking eigenvectors, but they are nice enough, and we will find a useful basis after all.

So I think you mean the geometric multiplicity of each eigenvalue should equal their corresponding algebraic multiplicities, to get a full set of eigenvectors. Something like that, I haven't thought carefully about the complex, maybe they always get a nice rotation interpretation (each conjugate pair).

Any yes, enjoy it, one of my favorite ways to appreciate linear algebra is that it is the most easily analyzed case of the obviously practical subject of maps from one collection of data to another collection of data, or a transform from one signal, through an operator to another signal, like in a circuit. Blah blah blah, multivariable math is cool!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K