How to get this integral into standard form

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on transforming the definite integral of 1/sqrt(c² - dv²) into the standard form of an integral f(v) dv, where c is a real positive constant exceeding the upper limit of the integral. The user seeks to derive this integral from first principles, specifically in the context of special relativity and Lorentz transformations. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in this approach compared to more straightforward methods.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of definite integrals and their properties
  • Familiarity with special relativity concepts, particularly Lorentz transformations
  • Knowledge of integration techniques in calculus
  • Experience with mathematical notation and manipulation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of integrals in the context of special relativity
  • Learn about the application of Lorentz transformations in physics
  • Explore advanced integration techniques, including substitution and transformation methods
  • Review the properties of definite integrals and their applications in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on special relativity, as well as mathematicians and engineers interested in advanced integration techniques.

nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,773
Reaction score
256
If I have the definite integral of 1/sqrt(c2-dv2) (without a dv after it), with c a real positive constant larger than the upper limit of the integral, how can I get it into the usual form of an integral f(v) dv ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you have written makes no sense at all. Can you give the context? Where did you see
[tex]\int \frac{1}{\sqrt{c^2- dv^2}}[/tex]
 
I was attempting to work out from first principles an integration (which, I know, can be done much more easily with another point of view, but I wanted to see what this more difficult path would lead to) from special relativity, adding up infinitesimal increments dv of increases in velocity (I omitted the constants in my question). That is, this is from a Lorentz transformation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K