How to Integrate 1/(x^3 + bx - c)?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter yuiop
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dx Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral of 1/(x^3 + bx - c) with respect to x cannot be expressed in a simple form due to the complexity of cubic polynomials. To integrate this expression, one must factor the polynomial, which can result in either three linear factors or one linear and one irreducible quadratic factor. The use of partial fractions is essential, allowing the integrand to be expressed as a sum of simpler fractions. Depending on the factorization, the resulting integrals can involve logarithmic and arctangent functions, but a general formula is unattainable due to the variability of coefficients.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial factorization, specifically cubic polynomials.
  • Familiarity with partial fraction decomposition techniques.
  • Knowledge of integration techniques involving logarithmic and arctangent functions.
  • Experience with completing the square for quadratic expressions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study advanced techniques in polynomial integration, focusing on cubic polynomials.
  • Learn about partial fraction decomposition in detail, especially for irreducible quadratics.
  • Explore the method of completing the cube for cubic polynomials.
  • Investigate the implications of treating variable functions as constants during integration.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, and anyone involved in advanced integration techniques, particularly those working with polynomial functions and seeking to understand complex integrals.

yuiop
Messages
3,962
Reaction score
20
What is the integral of 1/(x^3 + bx - c) with respect to x?

This is part of a larger problem I am working on, but finding the integral has proved a sticking point. I have simplified it as much as possible.

P.S. The larger problem is finding J(r) in this PF post https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=4397770&postcount=5
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It will not be possible to get a simple form for that integral. To integrate "1 over a polynomial" you have to factor the polynomial. Here, you have a cubic so, theoretically, in terms of real numbers, either of two things can happen: you can factor it into 3 linear factors or you can factor it into one linear factor and one "irreducible" quadratic. If there are three linear factors, you can use "partial fractions" to write the integrand as the sum of three fractions with linear denominator so the integral is a combination of three logarithms. If there is on linear factor and one irreducible quadratic you can use "partial fractions" to write the integrand as the sum of one fraction with a linear denominator and one fraction with a linear numerator and quadratic denominator. The first integral is, of course, a logrithm. Since the quadratic denominator in the second fraction is irreducible, you can, by "completing the square", write the denominator in the form (x- a)^2+ b. Making the change of variable, u= x- a, you can then write the fraction as "(cu+d)/(u^2+ b)= cu/(u^2+ d)+ b/(u^2+ d). The first of those can be integrated by letting v= u^2+ d and the second as an arctangent.

However, there are simply too many choices and too many possible "routes" depending on the coefficients to be able to write a general formula.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Since the quadratic denominator in the second fraction is irreducible, you can, by "completing the square", write the denominator in the form (x- a)^2+ b.
It seams that in this case, I have an irreducible cubic so perhaps I need to 'complete the cube' but if I try that I end up with additional factors of x and x^2 outside the cube.

Is there another approach to this problem? In the linked post the integral has a term m(x) which is of course a function of x as defined in that post. Is it possible to carry out the integral as if m(x) was simply a constant (m) and then deal with m(x) after the integration has been carried out? It seams easy enough to obtain the integral of m(x) dx.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K