Solving Kolb & Turner's Reheating Problem with 1st Law of Thermodynamics

  • Thread starter Thread starter pleasehelpmeno
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosmology
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving a specific equation related to reheating in cosmology, as presented in Kolb and Turner's work. The focus is on applying the first law of thermodynamics to understand energy conservation during the transition from inflaton to radiation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the application of the first law of thermodynamics, questioning how to define the term dQ in the context of reheating. There is discussion about the conservation of energy and the implications of particle non-conservation during reheating.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the first law and its application to the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the energy conservation equation, but there is no explicit consensus on the justification of terms or the derivation process.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the number of particles is not conserved during reheating, which raises questions about the phenomenological nature of certain terms in the equations being discussed.

pleasehelpmeno
Messages
154
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


i i am trying to derive \dot{\rho_{R}}+4H\rho_{R}-\Gamma_{\phi}\rho_{\phi}=0 as in Kolb an turner (Boltzmann describing reheating).

Is the correct approach to, use the 1st law dU=dQ-pdV, but what would dQ be?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is just the equation of conservation of energy, with an extra term with transfers energy from the inflaton to radiation.
 
how though can it be derived?
I no that: dU=(a^{3}\rho_{R}) and 1/3\rho dV= pdV, but I am not sure about dQ.

It is obviously then \rho_R d(a^3)+a^{3}d\rho_{R}=dQ - 1/3\rho_{R}d(a^3) Then by dividing through by dt one can get \dot{\rho}_{R}+4H\rho_{R} -\frac{dQ}{dt} =0.

I don't see how one can justify \Gamma_{\phi}\rho_{\phi}=\frac{dQ}{dt}
 
I don't see how you can justify using the first law in that form, when clearly in reheating the number of particles is not conserved. It's my understanding that the \Gamma \rho-term is just phenomenological.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
7K