How to measure the Sun's acceleration relative to the galaxy?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around how to measure the Sun's acceleration relative to the galaxy, exploring theoretical and practical aspects of this measurement. Participants consider various methods, including the use of accelerometers, parallax, and standard candles for distance measurement, while also delving into concepts of proper and coordinate acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that measuring the Sun's acceleration involves understanding the difference between proper acceleration (as measured by accelerometers) and coordinate acceleration, which is influenced by the Sun's motion relative to the galaxy.
  • There is a discussion about the challenges of measuring distances to nearby stars, with some asserting that parallax measurements are the most accurate for stars close enough.
  • Participants propose that brightness can be used to measure distances in the galaxy, particularly through standard candles like Cepheid variables, though there is debate about the applicability of this method to most stars.
  • Questions arise regarding the role of relativity in measuring the Sun's speed and whether its velocity necessitates relativistic considerations.
  • Inertia is discussed as a property of objects, with some participants questioning its definition and relationship to momentum and reference frames.
  • Some participants express amazement at the accuracy of stellar distance measurements and the confidence in these methods.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best methods for measuring the Sun's acceleration or the implications of relativity in this context. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain regarding the definitions and applications of proper and coordinate acceleration, as well as the methods for measuring distances in the galaxy.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of acceleration, the accuracy of distance measurements, and the unresolved nature of how inertia is conceptualized in relation to reference frames.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying astrophysics, cosmology, or anyone curious about the methods of measuring celestial dynamics and the underlying physics concepts.

KurtLudwig
Messages
146
Reaction score
31
How would the acceleration of our sun relative to our galaxy be determined?
A spaceship in orbit around our sun, with engines turned off, is in free fall. Accelerometers will read zero. Turning the engines on, the accelerometers will read the acceleration due to the thrust from the engines. Measuring the distances to nearby stars, which are also moving, is tricky. Measuring the distances to stars toward the center of our galaxy, maybe the best answer. Can brightness be used to measure distances in our galaxy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KurtLudwig said:
How would the acceleration of our sun relative to our galaxy be determined?

The sun is in free fall, just like the spaceship you mention, so the "acceleration" you refer to is coordinate acceleration, not proper acceleration. It is much too small to be measurable directly. You can estimate what it should be from the Sun's distance from the center and orbital period or velocity around the center, which are easily found online; we can estimate those numbers fairly well from observations.

KurtLudwig said:
Measuring the distances to nearby stars, which are also moving, is tricky.

Actually, distances to nearby stars--near enough to get a measurable parallax--are the easiest and most accurate distance measurements we have beyond the solar system.

KurtLudwig said:
Can brightness be used to measure distances in our galaxy?

For certain types of stars, the "standard candles" (such as Cepheid variables) where we have an independent way to measure brightness, yes. But for most stars, we try to measure the distance and then infer the brightness (absolute magnitude) from that and the apparent magnitude.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
Please correct if false or clarify: Is proper acceleration as measured by an accelerometer? Isn't coordinate acceleration a term used in relativity? Is our sun moving that fast that relativity is coming into play? According to Wikipedia, the sun travels at only 220km/s around the center of the milky way.
I understand, that there is no preferred or fixed reference position. The only constant is the speed of light. Can inertia be considered a momentary local reference frame? I still do not understand how inertia comes to be, almost as if matter is connected to other matter. An object in free fall has inertia, although its potential and kinetic energies are changing. By conservation of energy, the sum of potential and kinetic energy must stay constant, in the absence of heat dissipation. All the planets moving at different velocities have inertia. Is inertia the resistance to a change of momentum?
 
KurtLudwig said:
Is proper acceleration as measured by an accelerometer?

Yes.

KurtLudwig said:
Isn't coordinate acceleration a term used in relativity?

Typically, but that doesn't mean it's only applicable to things moving at relativistic speeds.

KurtLudwig said:
Is our sun moving that fast that relativity is coming into play?

It depends on how accurate you want your predictions and measurements to be.

KurtLudwig said:
Can inertia be considered a momentary local reference frame?

This doesn't make sense; inertia is a property of objects, not a frame.

KurtLudwig said:
I still do not understand how inertia comes to be

This is a separate question which should be asked in a separate thread.
 
KurtLudwig said:
Is proper acceleration as measured by an accelerometer?
Yes (which means that it's trivially zero for the sun because the sun is in free-fall). But here you aren't asking how we measure the proper acceleration, you're asking for the acceleration relative to the center of the galaxy, and acceleration "relative to" something else is cooordinate acceleration - indeed, that's fairly close to being the definition of coordinate acceleration.
Isn't coordinate acceleration a term used in relativity? Is our sun moving that fast that relativity is coming into play?
The term is used in relativity, but like "speed"and "position" that's not the only place it's used. Any time you're talking about acceleration "relative to" something else, you're talking coordinate acceleration; relativity doesn't have to be involved.

And as for how we measure coordinate acceleration? We don't. We measure the distance between the accelerating object and the "relative to" point in space, and see how it changes over time.
 
KurtLudwig said:
Is inertia the resistance to a change of momentum?
Doesn't the word 'Mass' do a perfectly adequate job here - at least in Newtonian Mechanics?
KurtLudwig said:
Can brightness be used to measure distances in our galaxy?
Red Shift and Parallax measurements work for distances within the Galaxy. At least over the near regions in the galaxy, parallax gives fairly accurate results. Also Cepheid Variables can be used for all galactic distances (your 'brightness' idea).
I'm always gobsmacked by the accuracy of (or at least the confidence in) measurements of stellar distances and speeds.
 
After viewing the Milky Way, while camping in Utah, I became hooked on astronomy and cosmology. You, the advisors at Physics Forums, are lucky to have chosen this field of study. I was building machinery to manufacture cars.
Thank you for your answers.
To support Physics Forums, I will buy all books, from your website
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K