How to Normalize the Basic Wave Equation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Marthius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave Wave equation
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
7 replies · 4K views
Marthius
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
This is a fairly simple question, but the first such question I have done. Inorder to check my work I was hoping someone could show me how to normalize the following.

[tex]\Psi(x,t) = Ae^{-a[(mx^{2}/\hbar)+it][/tex]
where m is the particles mass

And also that the expectation values of x and x2 would be.

Don't wory, this is not for a class, I am studying this on my own
 
Physics news on Phys.org
After playing with this I found

[tex]A = \sqrt[4]{\frac{2am}{\hbar\pi}}*e^{ait}[/tex]

making

[tex]\Psi = \sqrt[4]{\frac{2am}{\hbar\pi}}*e^{-amx^{2}/\hbar}[/tex]

Can annyone confirm this for me because I am really uncomfortable with my answer.
 
that looks alright, but have you lost your time component along the way? when calculating [tex]\left|A\right|^{2}[/tex] the time-dependence drops off, but you need to be sure to attach your value for [tex]A[/tex] to the full wavefunction. i think it should look like this? [tex]\Psi\left(x,t\right)=\left(2ma/\pi\hbar\right)^{1/4}e^{-amx^{2}/\hbar}e^{-iat}[/tex]
 
tshafer said:
that looks alright, but have you lost your time component along the way? when calculating [tex]\left|A\right|^{2}[/tex] the time-dependence drops off, but you need to be sure to attach your value for [tex]A[/tex] to the full wavefunction. i think it should look like this? [tex]\Psi\left(x,t\right)=\left(2ma/\pi\hbar\right)^{1/4}e^{-amx^{2}/\hbar}e^{-iat}[/tex]

the only think was that [tex]e^{iat}[/tex] from the second part of A canceld with [tex]e^{-iat}[/tex] from the wave function, or is that wrong.
 
You would be correct, but technically you're [tex]A[/tex] is wrong. The [tex]e^{-iat}[/tex] term cancels with its conjugate in the process of calculating [tex]A[/tex] through normalization. [tex]A[/tex] should be just [tex]\left(2ma/\pi\hbar\right)^{1/4}[/tex]
 
tshafer said:
You would be correct, but technically you're [tex]A[/tex] is wrong. The [tex]e^{-iat}[/tex] term cancels with its conjugate in the process of calculating [tex]A[/tex] through normalization. [tex]A[/tex] should be just [tex]\left(2ma/\pi\hbar\right)^{1/4}[/tex]

Looking back my mistake was simply squaring the wave function without taking the modulus first
 
I was working with this a little more, and came up with a corisponding potential energy function of:

V(x) = [tex]2a^{2}mx^{2}[/tex]

Could anyone run it and verify that I have this right (My text has no answer key)?

Here is the wave function again.
[tex]\Psi(x,t) = Ae^{-a[(mx^{2}/\hbar)+it][/tex]
where m is the particles mass