How to parameterize solid of revolution?

Click For Summary
To parameterize a solid of revolution defined by a piecewise function, start by expressing the circular arc of the first segment using x and z coordinates, such as x=2+cos(θ) and z=sin(θ) for the range π/2 to 3π/2. When rotating this arc about the z-axis, adjust the x and y values accordingly to x=(2+cos(θ))cos(α), y=(2+cos(θ))sin(α), and z=sin(θ) as α varies from 0 to 2π. This method effectively captures the curved portion of the solid. Alternatively, consider rotating the differential arc elements around for a potentially simpler approach. Understanding these parameterization techniques is crucial for calculating the surface area of the solid.
Kuma
Messages
129
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Here is the surface I need to parameterize. It is a solid of revolution.

58wDQ.png




Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So since its a piecewise function, I can define it as follows

(x-2)^2 + z^2 = 1, 1<x<2
z = -x+3, 2<x<3
z = x-3, 2<x<3

I know the formula for the area for a solid of revolution, but how do I parameterize this surface and then use that to calculate the surface area? I'm lost.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll show you how to parameterize one piece. That should get you started. I would express the circular arc like this:$$
x=2+\cos\theta,\ z = \sin\theta,\ \frac \pi 2\le \theta\le\frac{3\pi} 2$$Now if you rotate that about the z axis, that will change the ##x## and ##y## values:$$
x=(2+\cos\theta)\cos\alpha,\ y=(2+\cos\theta)\sin\alpha,\ z=\sin\theta$$Now if you let ##\alpha## very from ##0## to ##2\pi##, that will get the curved portion.

That's the general method. But if you don't have to do it that way, a probably simpler method would be to just rotate the ds arc elements around.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K