How to proof P(A U B U C) without using Venn Diagram

In summary, the conversation discusses how to calculate the probability of the union of three events, as well as how to prove the formula for calculating the probability of the union of two events. The proof involves using the Addition Rule for probability and being careful with positive and negative signs.
  • #1
ooooo
3
0
Do you know how to proof

P(A U B U C) = P(A) + P(B) + P(C) - P(A^B) - P(B^C) - P(C^A) + P(A^B^C)


^ is intersection.

Do you know how to find P(A U B U C U D)

Thank you very much.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Let

[tex]
D = B \cup C
[/tex]

and note that

[tex]
A \cup B \cup C = A \cup D
[/tex]

then

[tex]
\begin{align*}
\Pr(A \cup B \cup C) & = \Pr(A \cup D)\\
& = \Pr(A) + \Pr(D) - \Pr(A \cap D) \\
& = \Pr(A) + \Pr(B \cup C) - \Pr(A \cap D)\\
& = \Pr(A) + \Pr(B) + \Pr(C) - \Pr(B \cap C) - \Pr(A \cap D)
\end{align*}
[/tex]

The rest of the proof comes from realizing that

[tex]
\Pr(A \cap D) = \Pr(A \cap \left(B \cup C\right)) = \Pr((A \cap B) \cup (A \cap C)),
[/tex]

using the Addition Rule for probability to expand the final term, and being very careful with positive and negative signs.
 
  • #3
Thank you so much Statdad. I would like to ask another question.

How to proof P(A U B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A ^ B) ?

Thank you again.
 
  • #4
This proof isn't needed for the problem you posted above - is there a reason you need it here?
 
  • #5
Sorry. I'm just curious. :)
 
  • #6
No - I was interrupted by someone at the door.
Here is one method - there are others.
First, note that

[tex]
A \cup B = (A-B) \cup (A \cap B) \cup (B - A)
[/tex]

and the three sets on the right are pair-wise disjoint. Now

[tex]
\begin{align*}
\Pr(A \cup B) & = \Pr(A-B) + \Pr(A \cap B) + \Pr(B - A)\\
& = \left(\Pr(A-B) + \Pr(A \cap B) \right) + \left(\Pr(B-A) + \Pr(A \cap B)\right) - \Pr(A \cap B) \\
& = \Pr(A) + \Pr(B) - \Pr(A \cap B)
\end{align*}
[/tex]

Again, sorry for the abrupt end to my previous post - I'm getting really tired of our election season.
 

1. How do you prove P(A U B U C) without using a Venn Diagram?

There are several methods to prove P(A U B U C) without using a Venn Diagram. One method is using the formula P(A U B U C) = P(A) + P(B) + P(C) - P(A ∩ B) - P(A ∩ C) - P(B ∩ C) + P(A ∩ B ∩ C). Another method is using a truth table to show the different combinations of events A, B, and C and their probabilities. Finally, you can also use set notation and algebraic manipulation to prove P(A U B U C).

2. What is the purpose of proving P(A U B U C) without using a Venn Diagram?

The purpose of proving P(A U B U C) without using a Venn Diagram is to show the validity of the formula and to demonstrate the ability to use different mathematical methods to solve problems. It also allows for a more general approach to solving problems, as Venn Diagrams can be limiting in certain situations.

3. Can you provide an example of proving P(A U B U C) without using a Venn Diagram?

Sure, let's say we have three events A, B, and C with probabilities 0.4, 0.3, and 0.2 respectively. Using the formula P(A U B U C) = P(A) + P(B) + P(C) - P(A ∩ B) - P(A ∩ C) - P(B ∩ C) + P(A ∩ B ∩ C), we can calculate P(A U B U C) as 0.4 + 0.3 + 0.2 - 0.4*0.3 - 0.4*0.2 - 0.3*0.2 + 0.4*0.3*0.2 = 0.74. This shows that the probability of A, B, or C occurring is 0.74.

4. Are there any advantages to proving P(A U B U C) without using a Venn Diagram?

Yes, there are several advantages to proving P(A U B U C) without using a Venn Diagram. One advantage is that it allows for a more general approach to solving problems, as Venn Diagrams can be limiting in certain situations. It also demonstrates a deeper understanding of mathematical concepts and the ability to use different methods to solve problems.

5. What are the limitations of proving P(A U B U C) without using a Venn Diagram?

One limitation is that it may be more difficult for some individuals to conceptualize the problem without a visual representation like a Venn Diagram. It also may not be the most efficient method for solving certain problems, as Venn Diagrams can be quick and easy to use in some cases. Additionally, it may not be applicable to more complex situations with multiple events and probabilities.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
483
  • General Math
Replies
4
Views
867
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • General Math
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
807
  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
692
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top