I How to prove that 2n=1 has no integer solutions

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Davis 97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integer
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the equation 2n=1 has no integer solutions without referencing rational numbers. Participants suggest various approaches, including demonstrating that n must be both even and odd, leading to a contradiction. Another argument highlights that if 2n=1, it implies that 2 divides 1, which contradicts the definition of prime numbers. Additionally, it is noted that for any positive integer n, 2n is always greater than or equal to 2, thus never equaling 1. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding integer properties and definitions in proving the absence of solutions.
Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44
This might seem like a very simple problem, because we could just say that the only possible solution is n = 1/2, which is not an integer. But I am curious as to how to prove that there is no solution, with no knowledge of rational numbers, just as we can prove that x^2 = 2 as no rational solutions without any knowledge of irrational numbers.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I am confused. 1/2 is never an integer or even number. I am asking how I would prove that 2n=1 has no integer solutions, without just saying that n=1/2 is not an integer.
 
There are different approaches. For example, derive (from a chosen set of integer axioms) that n solving this equation must be both even and odd, a contradiction.
 
  • Like
Likes Mr Davis 97
Mr Davis 97 said:
This might seem like a very simple problem, because we could just say that the only possible solution is n = 1/2, which is not an integer. But I am curious as to how to prove that there is no solution, with no knowledge of rational numbers, just as we can prove that x^2 = 2 as no rational solutions without any knowledge of irrational numbers.
The first thing to do - as always - check the statement: What is an integer? The proof of the irrationality of ##\sqrt{2}## which you mentioned, uses, that rationals can be written as quotients of integers, which are products of primes.

If you take the definition of primes again, then ##2n=1## implies the prime ##2\,\vert \,1## and is therefore a unit. But primes aren't allowed to be units, so ##2 \nmid 1## and ##n \notin \mathbb{Z}\,.## Or if you like: the only units in ##\mathbb{Z}## are ##\pm 1## so it's impossible because of that.

I know this is a bit like cheating, because it plays with definitions, so again: what is an integer?
 
  • Like
Likes Mr Davis 97
I deleted my earlier post, and PAllen's reply to it.
 
PAllen said:
There are different approaches. For example, derive (from a chosen set of integer axioms) that n solving this equation must be both even and odd, a contradiction.
Or even simpler, along this line, it implies 1 is even; but 1 is odd.
 
  • Like
Likes dkotschessaa and Mr Davis 97
With inequalities: 2*0 is not 1 (skip this if you don't include 0 in the integers). For every integer n larger than 0, ##2n \geq 2 > 1##.
 
  • Like
Likes lavinia
Back
Top