How to prove that Cosh(x) = Cos(ix)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cocopops12
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the relationships between hyperbolic and trigonometric functions, specifically that Cosh(x) = Cos(ix) and related identities involving sine and hyperbolic sine functions. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and exploration of exponential functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that Cosh(x) is defined as (E^x + E^-x) / 2 and seeks to prove that Cosh(x) = Cos(ix).
  • Another participant asks for formulas relating cosine and sine to exponentials, indicating a need for foundational relationships.
  • Euler's identity is referenced multiple times, with participants noting its relevance to the discussion.
  • One participant suggests deriving the necessary formulas from Euler's identity by manipulating the equations for e^{ix} and e^{-ix}.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about how the exponential formulas were derived, indicating a gap in understanding.
  • A later reply discusses the use of Laplace transformations to relate cos(a*t) to its inverse, leading to a connection with cos(i*t) and cosh(t).
  • Participants explore the process of using partial fractions in the context of Laplace transformations to derive relationships between the functions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the proofs or derivations, with some expressing understanding while others remain confused about the steps involved. Multiple approaches are presented without resolution of which is the most effective or correct.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention needing specific exponential formulas for cosine and sine, indicating that the discussion may depend on definitions and assumptions that are not fully articulated.

cocopops12
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
i know that Cosh(x) = (E^x + E^-x ) / 2

how do i prove that Cosh(x) = Cos(ix) , where i is the imaginary unit
similarly Cosh(ix) = Cos(x)

and Sin(ix) = i Sinh(x)
similarly Sinh(ix) = i Sin(x)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know any formulas for cosine and sine that relate to exponentials?
 
yeah of course Euler's identity
e^ix = cos(x) + isin(x)
but i still can't do it :(
 
I should have been more clear, sorry. I meant a formula that only involves cosine and exponentials and a formula that only involves sines and exponentials. The cosine formula won't have sines in it and vice versa. Once you have those formulas, this becomes trivial to prove as you'll see.
 
scurty said:
I should have been more clear, sorry. I meant a formula that only involves cosine and exponentials and a formula that only involves sines and exponentials. The cosine formula won't have sines in it and vice versa. Once you have those formulas, this becomes trivial to prove as you'll see.

Best of all, you can derive these from Euler's identity: write down e^{ix} and e^{-ix} using it, and then add the two equations or subtract them to derive the relevant equations.
 
i have those formulas too, but i don't understand how they got them
 
cocopops12 said:
yeah of course Euler's identity
e^ix = cos(x) + isin(x)
but i still can't do it :(
e^ix = cos(x) + isin(x)
e^-ix = cos(x) - isin(x)

Add to get 2cos(x), subtract to get 2isin(x).

I presume you can do the rest.
 
it's clear now! thanks sir!
 
Easy! Just need a Laplace transformation sheet; then look at the transformation of cos(a*t), it says that L{cos(a*t)}=s/(s^2+a^2). That means that the inverse Laplace transformation of s/(s^2+a^2) is cos(at), right.
L^(-1){s/(s^2+a^2)}=cos(a*t)

Then ask yourself... Which is the inverse Laplace transformation of s/(s^2-1)?
that means your a^2 would be -1 so a=sqrt(-1)=i
then L^(-1){s/(s^2-1)}=L^(-1){s/(s^2+i)}=cos(i*t)

Now let do that by partial fractions:
L^(-1){s/(s^2-1)}=L^(-1){A/(s-1)+B/(s+1)}
s/(s^2-1)=A/(s-1)+B/(s+1); then
s/[(s-1)*(s+1)]=A/(s-1)+B/(s+1); then if you multiplie that equation for (s-1)(s+1) you got
s=A*(s+1)+B*(s-1); then
s=A*s+A+B*s-B=(A+B)*s+(A-B); now you got a equation system;
s=(A+B)*s and 0=A-B
A+B=1 and A-B=0; if you resolve
A=1/2=B; so
L^(-1){A/(s-1)+B/(s+1)}=L^(-1){(1/2)/(s-1)+(1/2)/(s+1)}=L^(-1){(1/2)/(s-1)}+L^(-1){(1/2)/(s+1)}=
(1/2)*L^(-1){1/(s-1)}+(1/2)*L^(-1){1/(s+1)}=(1/2)*(L^(-1){1/(s-1)}+L^(-1){1/(s+1)})

If you look at the inverse Laplace transformation formula for 1/(s-a) you will see e^(a*t) so
L^(-1){1/(s-1)}=e^t
and
L^(-1){1/(s+1)}=e^-t
so
(1/2)*(L^(-1){1/(s-1)}+L^(-1){1/(s+1)})=(1/2)*(e^t+e^-t)=(e^t+e^-t)/2=cosh(t)
so cos(i*t)=cosh(t)

It's the same process to proof sen(i*t)=senh(t)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kasikh

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K