Undergrad How to prove that ##f## is integrable given that ##g## is integrable?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the integrability of a function ##f: [a,b] \to \mathbb{R}## given that another function ##g: [a,b] \to \mathbb{R}## is integrable. The key conclusion is that if ##f## agrees with ##g## on all but finitely many points, then ##f## remains integrable. The proof utilizes the definitions of Riemann integrability, specifically the conditions involving upper and lower sums, and demonstrates that changing the value of ##f## at a finite number of points does not affect its integrability. The discussion also emphasizes the importance of boundedness and the measure of discontinuities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Riemann integrability and its definitions
  • Familiarity with upper and lower Darboux sums
  • Knowledge of partitions in the context of integration
  • Basic concepts of bounded functions and continuity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definitions and characterizations of Riemann integrability
  • Learn about the properties of upper and lower Darboux sums
  • Explore the implications of changing function values on integrability
  • Investigate the relationship between Riemann and Lebesgue integrals
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone interested in understanding the conditions for the integrability of functions, particularly in the context of Riemann integration.

  • #31
There is a more elegant proof.

Notation-wise, you will confuse the reader and yourself if you have x_i being both the points at which f(x) \neq g(x) and the points of an arbitrary partition. So I will call the former \{\xi_k : k = 1, \dots, n\}.

We can write f(x) = g(x) + \sum_{k=1}^n (f(\xi_k) - g(\xi_k)) h_k(x) where <br /> h_k : [a,b] \to \mathbb{R} : x \mapsto \begin{cases} 0 &amp; x \neq \xi_k \\ 1 &amp; x = \xi_k.\end{cases} It suffices to show that each h_k is (Darboux) integrable, since a linear combination of finitely many (Darboux) integrable functions is (Darboux) integrable. (The one with the upper and lower sums being arbitrarily close to each other is Darboux integrability; it is however completely equivalent to Riemann integrability.)

Let \epsilon &gt; 0 and D = \{x_0 = a, \dots, x_m = b\} a partition of [a.b] with \|D\| = \max\{\delta_i = x_i - x_{i-1}, i = 1, \dots, m\} &lt; \frac12 \epsilon. Then there exists a minimal 1 \leq i_1\leq m such that x_{i_1-1} \leq \xi_k \leq x_{i_1}. We then have that M_i - m_i = 0 for every i except for i_1 and, if x_{i_1} = \xi_k and i_1 &lt; m, also i_1+1. For these intervals M_i - m_i = 1. Thus (M_i - m_i)\delta_i = 0 except for at most two intervals for which (M_i - m_i)\delta_i = \delta_i \leq \|D\|. Thus <br /> U(h_k,D) - L(h_k,D) \leq 2\|D\| &lt; \epsilon.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes etotheipi, member 587159 and Adesh

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K