How to relate mass defect to kinetic energies?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between mass defect and kinetic energies in the context of nuclear reactions, particularly focusing on the Q-factor and its implications for particle decay processes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the connection between mass defect and kinetic energy, with some considering the Q-factor as a potential link. Questions arise regarding the kinetic energy of parent particles and the relevance of different reference frames. There is also discussion about the implications of momentum in particle decay.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing insights and questioning the assumptions behind the problem. Some have offered interpretations of the Q-factor and its relation to kinetic energies, while others are still seeking clarity on specific aspects of the question.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the equations for Q are valid in the rest frame of the parent particle, and there is uncertainty about the relevance of certain terms and conditions mentioned in the original problem statement.

rwooduk
Messages
757
Reaction score
59

Homework Statement


Just one more nuclear question if I may,

wrG9UEO.jpg


Homework Equations


None.

The Attempt at a Solution


I can do the first part of this question, but am unsure on the second part. I thought it may be related to the Q-factor (the difference in energy of the initial and final products for a reaction) but I'm not sure. And how can the parent products have kinetic energy? is it moving?

Does it relate to this diagram (sorry for the quality, my paint skills have decayed exponentially since my teenage years)

aIH3YsV.jpg


Or am I right in thinking it wants the Q-factor equation which would be somethihng like ##
Q = M_{parent} - M_{daughter}> 0\\\\
Q= \sum E_{k}##

thanks again for any ideas.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rwooduk said:
And how can the parent products have kinetic energy? is it moving?
There are always frames where the parent particle is moving.
What are P_min and P_max?
Those equations for Q are true in the rest frame of the parent particle only.
 
mfb said:
There are always frames where the parent particle is moving.
What are P_min and P_max?
Those equations for Q are true in the rest frame of the parent particle only.

P_min and P_max relate to the graph for beta decay wiht intensity vs momentum, and describe how the particles have different directions for min and max. I'm unsure if it's related.

What do you think the question is trying to get at?

thanks again for the reply
 
In the rest frame, you know the sum of kinetic energies is always the same (it is Q).
How is Q related to the rest masses of the particles?
 
mfb said:
In the rest frame, you know the sum of kinetic energies is always the same (it is Q).
How is Q related to the rest masses of the particles?

If you had 2 particles decaying into 2 other particles it would be

##Q=\Delta mc ^{2}=(m_{A}+m_{B})c^{2}-(m_{C}+m_{D})c^{2}= E_{Kin,C}+ E_{Kin,D}-E_{Kin,A}-E_{Kin,B}##

hmm have I just answered the question?
 
Particle decay is always a process of a single particle (can be composite like a hadron, but then it is still a single object).
 
mfb said:
Particle decay is always a process of a single particle (can be composite like a hadron, but then it is still a single object).

Good point, I'm not sure why that is given in the notes, perhaps just an example of what Q is.

So

##Q=\Delta mc ^{2}=E_{Kin,A}-E_{Kin,B}-E_{Kin,C}## where A is the decaying particle and B and C are the products, would you think that would be what the question is asking for?
 
Probably.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rwooduk

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K