Kinetic energy of the system of 2 masses....

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the kinetic energy of a system consisting of two particles, focusing on the relationship between the kinetic energy of the center of mass and the total kinetic energy of the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various cases, including equal masses moving in opposite directions and scenarios where one particle's velocity is zero. They attempt to compare the kinetic energy of the system with that of the center of mass.

Discussion Status

Some participants have suggested specific cases to analyze the relationship between the kinetic energies, while others express uncertainty about their conclusions. There is ongoing exploration of different scenarios, and guidance has been offered to consider the vector nature of velocities.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the information they can use or assume. The discussion includes questioning the validity of conclusions drawn from singular examples.

Human_being

Homework Statement


Velocity of centre of mass of two particles is v and the sum of the masses of two particles is m.
Kinetic energy of the system -
(A) will be equal to ½mv²
(B) will always be less than ½mv²
(C) will be greater than or equal to ½mv²
(D) will always be greater than ½mv²

Homework Equations


Kinetic energy = ½mv²

The Attempt at a Solution


I assumed the velocity of particles to be v1 and v2 and the mass of particles to be m1 and m2 respectively.

Now Kinetic energy of centre of mass = ½mv² = ½(m1v1 + m2v2)²/ (m1 + m2)

And kinetic energy of system = ½( m1v1² + m2v2²)

Then I tried to compare them and find out which is larger but I couldn't do so.
The only conclusion I came to was that they both will be equal when v1 = v2.
How should I proceed now?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to consider some specific cases.
Case 1: m1 = m2, v1 = -v2 (m1 traveling in +x direction, m2 in the -x direction, same speed).
 
lewando said:
Try to consider some specific cases.
Case 1: m1 = m2, v1 = -v2 (m1 traveling in +x direction, m2 in the -x direction, same speed).

Then kinetic energy of centre of mass will be zero and that of system will be mv².
So, can I safely conclude from here that kinetic energy of system will always be greater than or equal to kinetic energy of centre of mass?
 
Have you considered any other cases?
 
Human_being said:
can I safely conclude from here that kinetic energy of system will always be greater than or equal to kinetic energy of centre of mass?
You can't assume that based on a single example.
Human_being said:
tried to compare them
How? Please post your attempt. And remember that the velocities are vectors.
 
lewando said:
Have you considered any other cases?
Yes, I considered when either v1 or v2 is zero.
Again I got the result that kinetic energy of system is greater than kinetic energy of centre of mass.
 
haruspex said:
How? Please post your attempt. And remember that the velocities are vectors.
As I said I couldn't do it.
What I did was something like this -
½mv² = ½(m1/m1 + m2)m1v1² + ½m2/(m1 + m2)m2v2² + m1m2v1v2/m1 + m2 - (1)

Kinetic Energy of system = ½m1v1² + ½m2v2² - (2)

So, first two terms of equation (1) are smaller than the two terms of equation (2) respectively but I couldn't do anything about the third term of equation (1).
 
Human_being said:
As I said I couldn't do it.
What I did was something like this -
½mv² = ½(m1/m1 + m2)m1v1² + ½m2/(m1 + m2)m2v2² + m1m2v1v2/m1 + m2 - (1)

Kinetic Energy of system = ½m1v1² + ½m2v2² - (2)

So, first two terms of equation (1) are smaller than the two terms of equation (2) respectively but I couldn't do anything about the third term of equation (1).
So subtract one from the other. To make it easier, multiply both by m first.
 
haruspex said:
So subtract one from the other. To make it easier, multiply both by m first.

Ok, I got it.
When I subtracted (1) from (2) my answer came positive.

Thank you so much haruspex and lewando for helping me. This was my first question and I am happy that it's solved.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
806
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K