How to Resolve Control Relay Grounding Conflicts in Heliostat Refurbishment?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around resolving grounding conflicts in control circuits for three-phase motors in a heliostat refurbishment project. Participants explore electronic isolation methods for relay control inputs, wiring diagrams, and component compatibility.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes issues with triggering two Struthers-Dunn relays simultaneously due to a shared ground from a digital IO board.
  • Another participant questions the accuracy of the wiring diagram, suggesting the possibility of incorrect biasing of LED inputs.
  • A suggestion is made to use 4053 bilateral switches to control LED inputs, with a reference to a datasheet.
  • A participant notes that their older model of the relay lacks indicator LEDs but assumes similar circuitry is used.
  • It is mentioned that the system only functions when the grounds are physically separated, raising questions about the circuit design.
  • One participant reports success in using CRYDOM SSRs to switch grounds, indicating a potential solution to the problem.
  • Another participant suggests that the relays may contain opto-isolators rather than indicator LEDs and supports the use of CRYDOMs over 4053s for this application.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the wiring diagram's accuracy and the components used for isolation. There is no consensus on the best approach, as multiple solutions are proposed and tested.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential limitations in the wiring diagram and the assumptions made about the relay models. The discussion includes unresolved questions about circuit behavior when grounds are interconnected.

mrgilpin
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to refurbish a Heliostat and utilize a computer to control the three phase motors that came with the device. However, I'm having an issue with my control circiut for the three phase relays I've purchased.

I'm using two Struthers-Dunn 645RT series SS motor reversing relays which can be found here

http://www.struthers-dunn.com/images/645RT%20Flyer.pdf

The wiring diagram on the 2nd page shows both the forward and reverse control inputs.

I can get both of these to trigger independently utilizing my digital IO board attached to my computer. However, if both of these inputs are connected simultaneously the relays do not work.

My digital IO board only has a single ground, and if both the forward and reverse control inputs share a common ground, the relay will no longer trigger.

The only way to get one of the control inputs to work is to physically disconnect the ground of the opposite input.

I've tried to install diodes on the ground lines to prevent current leakage up into the opposite control but this also didn't work.

Is there a way to electronically isolate the grounds on these control inputs?
I purchased these solid state relays for the switching speed, however, Struthers-Dunn says that these relays are difficult to control unless mechanical relays are used for the control inputs.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
An odd note about the diagram on page 2 of the referenced document: It appears the LED input on the right-hand side (Reverse) is biased incorrectly by the battery, while the LED on the left (Forward) appears to be biased correctly. Is it possible the diagram is wrong, and the center terminal is actually a common cathode?

In any case, you might consider using 4 outputs from a pair of 4053's to control your LED inputs:

http://www.onsemi.com/pub_link/Collateral/MC74HC4051A-D.PDF

There are different models with different voltage ratings, but this one should work for you. The 405X series of bilateral switches are really very handy.

Fish
 
Last edited:
Fish4Fun said:
An odd note about the diagram on page 2 of the referenced document: It appears the LED input on the right-hand side (Reverse) is biased incorrectly by the battery, while the LED on the left (Forward) appears to be biased correctly. Is it possible the diagram is wrong, and the center terminal is actually a common cathode?

In any case, you might consider using 4 outputs from a pair of 4053's to control your LED inputs:

http://www.onsemi.com/pub_link/Collateral/MC74HC4051A-D.PDF

There are different models with different voltage ratings, but this one should work for you. The 405X series of bilateral switches are really very handy.

Fish

Thanks for the help!

I didn't notice that error in the diagram, maybe that has something to do with it. I think one of the issues might be that I'm using a older model of this relay that was shipped to me by Newark. My relays do not have indicator LEDs, however, I assume that they are using similar circuitry.

Putting a voltage across the two control inputs individualy as indicated in the diagram DOES work though.

Whats strange is it only functions if the two grounds are not interconnected. I can pull the positive input from the opposite control (breaking the circuit?) and the system still does not function. It's only when the ground are physically separated that the system works.

I'll have to give the 405x series chips a try, however, I'm hoping to get this working by tomorrow afternoon so I don't have time to source the parts.

I have a whole box of CRYDOM DC60S3 SSRs laying around. I'll try to use these to separate the grounds for the system...

UPDATE! Using the CRYDOMs to switch the grounds works. If the 405x chips operate similarly I'll be able to solder up a interface box between the computer and the relays. That'll look much better than the breadboard monstrosity currently sitting on my desk
 
Last edited:
mrgilpin,

I do not think those are indicator LEDs, I would assume they are opto-isolators, most likely OPTO-TRIACs. Great news on the CRYDOMs working! 4053's are a bunch cheaper and smaller, but if the CRYDOM's work, stick with them!

Fish
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
478