How to scale a logistic equation to become dimensionless?

  • Thread starter Thread starter miclectric
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scale
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on scaling the logistic equation dN/dt = N(r-a(N-b)^2) into a dimensionless form dn/dtao=n(1-a(n-1)^2). The key substitutions suggested are n=N/c and tao=t/d, where c and d are constants that need to be determined. Participants emphasize the importance of simplifying the equation after substitution to identify the correct values for c and d. Successful transformation requires careful manipulation of the equation and proper application of the suggested substitutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logistic equations and their dynamics
  • Familiarity with dimensionless scaling techniques
  • Knowledge of differential equations and separation of variables
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Research techniques for transforming differential equations into dimensionless forms
  • Study the method of separation of variables in differential equations
  • Learn about scaling parameters in mathematical modeling
  • Explore examples of logistic growth models and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in mathematics, particularly those studying differential equations and mathematical modeling, as well as anyone interested in scaling techniques for logistic equations.

miclectric
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have an equation: dN/dt = N(r-a(N-b)^2) where r,a,b>0 are constants and I need to scale it to the dimensionless form dn/dtao=n(1-a(n-1)^2), however, I tried many ways and I am still unable to get it into the form. The question also suggests using n=N/c and tao=t/d as a substitution.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to first expand out the N in the original equation and tried a separation of equation form to get the N's all on one side and dt on the other, but I can't seem to do this. I've also tried to substitute the suggested substitutions, however I can't seem to get it to the form either... :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
miclectric said:

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to first expand out the N in the original equation and tried a separation of equation form to get the N's all on one side and dt on the other, but I can't seem to do this. I've also tried to substitute the suggested substitutions, however I can't seem to get it to the form either... :(
Please show your work then. The given substitutions will work, you just have to find c and d (that will become clear once you simplify the equation).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K