How to show if a given array of numbers is a vector?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conditions under which an array of two numbers, p=(ap1, bp2), qualifies as a vector. It is established that for p to be a vector, the components must satisfy the equality a=b. The transformation equation p'=R(θ)p, where R is the rotation matrix, is crucial in demonstrating this property. Additionally, the transformation of the expression (p2q3, p3q1, p1q2) under rotation is analyzed to prove it is not a vector, emphasizing the importance of context in defining vectors within a vector space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and their properties
  • Familiarity with rotation matrices and transformations
  • Knowledge of tensor properties and definitions
  • Basic concepts of linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of vector spaces in linear algebra
  • Learn about rotation matrices and their applications in transformations
  • Explore the concept of tensors and their relation to vectors
  • Investigate the implications of vector transformations in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics and mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra and tensor analysis, as well as anyone interested in the foundational concepts of vector spaces and transformations.

shinobi20
Messages
277
Reaction score
20

Homework Statement


I'm reading Zee's book Einstein Gravity, I'm in the section where he said that given an array of two numbers p=(ap1, bp2), it is not a vector unless a=b. He just stated it without really showing how it must be like that. I know that a vector should satisfy a transformation p'=R(θ)p with R as the rotation matrix.

In the exercises he also asked to prove that (p2q3, p3q1, p1q2) is not a vector by checking how it transforms under rotation.

Homework Equations


p'=R(θ)p with R as the rotation matrix

The Attempt at a Solution


For the first part, p'=Rp yields (ap1cosθ - bp2sinθ, ap1sinθ + bp2cosθ). I'm not sure what this is implying.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question cannot be answered without a great deal more context which, from the sound of it, may need to be the whole containing chapter.

A vector is an element of a vector space, and is defined in relation to that space. To say something is a vector without the context of knowing what vector space we are talking about is like saying a person is a 'member'. A member of what?

Any object can be turned into a vector by constructing a vector space around it, using it as a basis element.

An ordered pair of real numbers is trivially an element of the vector space ##\mathbb{R}^2##, but I doubt that's what the author is talking about.
 
The author wants to show that it is not a vector if it doesn't preserve the length after rotation. This is tensors actually.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K