Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

How to show laminations minimizes eddy current?

  1. Jun 8, 2015 #1

    kelvin490

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    In transformer, lamination is an effective method to minimize eddy current and thus energy loss. I just wonder how can we show that the energy loss due to eddy current in those laminates is added up to be less than that without lamination (suppose the total cross sectional areas are the same)?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 8, 2015 #2

    Hesch

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    There are also losses in iron due to magnetic hysterisis in iron:

    BHCurve.gif

    I think the hysterisis losses will be the same, laminated iron or not. But anyway:

    Connect the (unloaded) transformers to the mains supply. Measure their power consumptions by a watt-meter, or measure the temperature gradients of the cores.
     
    Last edited: Jun 8, 2015
  4. Jun 8, 2015 #3

    berkeman

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    What is the Relevant Equation for calculating the current in a loop with a changing magnetic field piercing the loop? What part of that equation are you affecting when you divide up a piece of metal into laminations that are insulated from each other? :smile:
     
  5. Jun 10, 2015 #4

    kelvin490

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I don't know...
     
  6. Jun 10, 2015 #5

    berkeman

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

  7. Jun 10, 2015 #6

    kelvin490

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Path lengths are different, so the integral for one laminate is small. If I add it up, is it smaller than one large piece?
     
  8. Jun 10, 2015 #7

    berkeman

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    That may be one effect, but there is a more important one. Under Faraday's Law, when you have an area that has a changing flux, that induces a voltage around the loop area, which generates an eddy current in this case. Since the induced voltage and resulting eddy current depends on the _____ ...
     
  9. Jun 10, 2015 #8

    Hesch

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    @kelvin490: You must regard that laminated iron is mixed up with silicon. This silicon decreases the magnetic proporties a little, but the electrical proporties (conductivity ) are decreased much more, thereby lowering the Eddy current.

    So be cautious analysing the results of the measurements.
     
    Last edited: Jun 10, 2015
  10. Jun 10, 2015 #9

    Hesch

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Solution to this problem:

    Build a cube of laminated iron and make some coil that fits this cube. ( Saw a piece of the centerleg out of some transformer core ).

    Now you induce a magnetic (AC) field parallel to the lamination, thereafter (moving the coil) induce the magnetic field perpendicular to the lamination.

    Your measurements will be different ( I promise ). Think about why?

    Is the magnetic field in a transformer parallel or perpendicular to the lamination?
     
    Last edited: Jun 10, 2015
  11. Jun 10, 2015 #10

    kelvin490

    User Avatar
    Gold Member


    Thanks for the answer. But I am not asking for experimental method to show they are different. Lamination has been used in transformers for years, why do I need experimental method to prove it?

    What I ask is a theoretical approach.
     
  12. Jun 10, 2015 #11

    kelvin490

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Area?
     
  13. Jun 10, 2015 #12

    berkeman

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Yes! :smile:

    The area ratios how with the circumference?
     
  14. Jun 10, 2015 #13

    kelvin490

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    But we need to show their energy loss added up to be smaller than that in a larger, undivided area.
     
  15. Jun 10, 2015 #14

    berkeman

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    So this is schoolwork?

    And if so, why haven't you been studying Faraday's Law as part of the preparation for this homework question?
     
  16. Jun 10, 2015 #15

    kelvin490

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    It's not HW.
     
  17. Jun 11, 2015 #16

    Hesch

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Last edited by a moderator: May 7, 2017
  18. Jun 11, 2015 #17

    kelvin490

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Last edited by a moderator: May 7, 2017
  19. Jun 11, 2015 #18

    berkeman

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    BTW @kelvin490 -- Can you guess why higher frequency ferrite transformers do not have laminations? :smile:
     
  20. Jun 11, 2015 #19

    kelvin490

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    High reactance?
     
  21. Jun 11, 2015 #20

    berkeman

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    No, not reactance...
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: How to show laminations minimizes eddy current?
  1. Eddy currents (Replies: 1)

  2. Eddy current (Replies: 2)

  3. Eddy currents (Replies: 1)

  4. Eddy currents (Replies: 3)

Loading...