How to Show \widehat{A}\Psi(x) = \Psi(x + b)?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating the relationship \widehat{A}\Psi(x) = \Psi(x + b), where b is a constant. The context is rooted in quantum mechanics and involves the operator \widehat{A} defined as exp(b[d/dx]).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using a Taylor expansion of \Psi(x + b) and comparing it to the power series expansion of \widehat{A} applied to \Psi(x). There are questions about what function to expand and the implications of the derivative operators acting on \Psi(x).

Discussion Status

Some participants have confirmed their understanding of the Taylor series expansion and its relation to the problem. There is curiosity about the implications of \Psi(x) being an eigenstate of \widehat{A}, with discussions exploring the nature of eigenstates and their definitions.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted uncertainty regarding the specific form of \Psi(x) since it is not explicitly provided in the problem statement, which may affect the approach to the solution.

Void123
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that [tex]\widehat{A}\Psi(x) = \Psi(x + b)[/tex], where [tex]b[/tex] is a constant.



Homework Equations



Given: [tex]\widehat{A} = exp(b[d/dx])[/tex]



The Attempt at a Solution



I know I'm supposed to write out the function as a power series expansion, though I'm not sure what I am exactly to do after this. What is (d/dx) of? What information do the above expressions convey?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Write out a taylor expansion of psi(x+b) around x. Now compare that with the power series expansion of A applied to psi(x). The derivative operators will operate on psi(x). Don't you see a similarity in the two sides?
 
Pardon my ignorance, but what would I be expanding since I am not explicitly given a function for [tex]\Psi(x)[/tex]?
 
Write them out without assuming you know psi(x). The first derivative of psi(x) is psi'(x), the second is psi''(x) etc etc.
 
Just to make sure my work is correct, would I get {[(b^n)/n!]*(d/dx)^n}*[tex]\Psi(x)[/tex]?
 
Well, yeah. Isn't that the Taylor series of psi(x+b) expanded around x?
 
Okay, so I did it right. Though, I am curious about [tex]\Psi(x + b)[/tex]. If [tex]\Psi(x)[/tex] is an eigenstate of [tex]\widehat{A}[/tex], then the former is equal to some factor times [tex]\Psi(x)[/tex] right?
 
Void123 said:
Okay, so I did it right. Though, I am curious about [tex]\Psi(x + b)[/tex]. If [tex]\Psi(x)[/tex] is an eigenstate of [tex]\widehat{A}[/tex], then the former is equal to some factor times [tex]\Psi(x)[/tex] right?

That's the definition of an eigenstate alright, A(psi(x))=k*psi(x)=psi(x+b).
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K