How to Simplify (Lnx)^n for Homework?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GeekPioneer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simplify
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on simplifying the expression (ln x)^n, specifically (ln 2)^3. Participants clarify that (ln x)^n cannot be simplified further in its current form, and emphasize the distinction between (ln x)^n and ln(x^n), where the latter can be simplified to n * ln(x). The conversation also touches on potential methods for solving equations involving (ln 2)^4, including exponentiation with the base e. Ultimately, the consensus is that (ln x)^n remains as is, without simplification.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of natural logarithms (ln)
  • Familiarity with logarithmic identities
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
  • Knowledge of exponentiation and roots
NEXT STEPS
  • Research logarithmic identities and their applications
  • Study the properties of natural logarithms in depth
  • Explore solving equations involving logarithmic expressions
  • Learn about the relationship between logarithms and exponentials
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, mathematics enthusiasts, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of logarithmic functions and their properties.

GeekPioneer
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Im trying to simply (lnx)^n say (ln2)^3

Homework Equations



?


The Attempt at a Solution



Im lost on this one I can't find any information. All info I'm finding is dilute because of similar search terms.

Please, and thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's no way to simplify it in the form you have? Are you sure it isn't meant to be read as ln(x^n) Where the exponent is in the natural log? If so, the rules of logarithms tell us that we can move the n to the front and write it as n*ln(x). So, how would this look for say ln(2^3)?
 
no its (ln2)^4 not ln2^4=4ln2 solving this I believe involves setting it equal to σ or some variable and then exponentiating using e. Although I could be completely wrong. I know this can be simplified and solve because my professor did it in class, I just can't find my notes from that day.
 
Well, letting (ln2)^4 and trying to solve for say 2 here, we'd have to involve a 4th root:

Two solutions (for even roots):
ln2 = 4-root(y) and ln2 = -4-root(y)

So now, we can use e as:

2=e^(4-root(y)) and 2=e^(-4-root(y))=1/e^(4-root(y))

And of of course for odd roots it isn't necessary.

Does this look similar?
 
I think I'm following you've if 4-root(y) means y1/4. Regardless that doesn't look right? Thanks for the interest though :). We should be able to get a concrete answer like 16ln2 or something if i remember correctly!
 
GeekPioneer said:
I think I'm following you've if 4-root(y) means y1/4. Regardless that doesn't look right? Thanks for the interest though :). We should be able to get a concrete answer like 16ln2 or something if i remember correctly!

No, ln(x)^n is just ln(x)^n. ln(x^n)=n*ln(x), but that's not what you are asking about.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
13K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K