How to Solve a Circuit Using Laplace Transform?

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eehelp150
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Laplace
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
10 replies · 3K views
eehelp150
Messages
235
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


upload_2016-11-30_0-44-27.png

Assume zero initial conditions

Step 1. Write the nodal equations to find i(t) in the time domain.
Step 2.Solve the differential equation obtained in step 1 using laplace to obtain i(t).

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Convert to sdomain
##7e^{-6t}## becomes ##\frac{7}{s+6}##
4H becomes 4s

##\frac{7}{s+6}+\frac{V_A}{5}+\frac{1}{4s}\int_{0}^{t}(V_A-V_B)=0##

##\frac{1}{4s}\int_{0}^{t}(V_B-V_A)+\frac{V_B}{3}=0##

Am I doing this right?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-11-30_0-33-12.png
    upload_2016-11-30_0-33-12.png
    4.7 KB · Views: 492
Physics news on Phys.org
There should be no explicit integrals or derivatives required in the equations that you write. Laplace takes care of all that implicitly.

The Laplace "variable" s is more of an operator than a variable. When s multiplies a Laplace domain function (such as sVa(s)) it is equivalent to differentiating the corresponding time-domain function. When a Laplace domain function is divided by s, it is equivalent to integrating in the time domain. So (ignoring initial conditions):

##sF(s) ⇔ \frac{d}{dt}f(t)##

##\frac{1}{s} F(s) ⇔ \int_o^t f(\tau)~d \tau##

A nice thing about the Laplace domain is that reactive components have "impedances" that automatically take care of their own differentiation and integration. Thus Laplace domain "impedances" sL for inductors and 1/(sC) for capacitors carry with them their own operators that automatically handle the calculus. All you have to do is write your circuit equations with these "impedances", manipulating them with standard algebra, and it's as though all the calculus were being done for you behind the scenes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
gneill said:
There should be no explicit integrals or derivatives required in the equations that you write. Laplace takes care of all that implicitly.

The Laplace "variable" s is more of an operator than a variable. When s multiplies a Laplace domain function (such as sVa(s)) it is equivalent to differentiating the corresponding time-domain function. When a Laplace domain function is divided by s, it is equivalent to integrating in the time domain. So (ignoring initial conditions):

##sF(s) ⇔ \frac{d}{dt}f(t)##

##\frac{1}{s} F(s) ⇔ \int_o^t f(\tau)~d \tau##

A nice thing about the Laplace domain is that reactive components have "impedances" that automatically take care of their own differentiation and integration. Thus Laplace domain "impedances" sL for inductors and 1/(sC) for capacitors carry with them their own operators that automatically handle the calculus. All you have to do is write your circuit equations with these "impedances", manipulating them with standard algebra, and it's as though all the calculus were being done for you behind the scenes.
##\frac{7}{s+6}+\frac{V_A}{5}+\frac{V_A-V_B}{4s}=0##
##\frac{V_B-V_A}{4s}+\frac{V_B}{3}=0##
Does this look better?
 
Yes, that looks better. Just check the sign on the first term of the first equation. As written you have the source current flowing out of node A (judging by how you've written the other terms).
 
gneill said:
Yes, that looks better. Just check the sign on the first term of the first equation. As written you have the source current flowing out of node A (judging by how you've written the other terms).
##-\frac{7}{s+6}+\frac{V_A}{5}+\frac{V_A-V_B}{4s}=0##
##\frac{V_B-V_A}{4s}+\frac{V_B}{3}=0##

##\frac{-28s}{s+6}+\frac{4sV_A}{5}+V_A-V_B=0##
##\frac{-28s}{s+6}+\frac{4sV_A}{5}+V_A=V_B##

##\frac{\frac{-28s}{s+6}+\frac{4sV_A}{5}+V_A-V_A}{4s}+\frac{\frac{-28s}{s+6}+\frac{4sV_A}{5}+V_A}{3}=0##

##\frac{-7s}{s+6}+\frac{V_A}{5}+\frac{-28s}{3s+18}+\frac{4sV_A}{15}+\frac{V_A}{3}=0####V_A(\frac{1}{5}+\frac{1}{3}+\frac{4s}{15})=\frac{49s}{3s+18}##
##V_A(\frac{8}{15}+\frac{4s}{15})=\frac{49s}{3s+18}##
##V_A=\frac{49s}{3s+18}*\frac{15}{8+4s}##

Am I on the right track?
 
Last edited:
eehelp150 said:
##-\frac{7}{s+6}+\frac{V_A}{5}+\frac{V_A-V_B}{4s}=0##
##\frac{V_B-V_A}{4s}+\frac{V_B}{3}=0##

##\frac{-28s}{s+6}+\frac{4sV_A}{5}+V_A-V_B=0##
##\frac{-28s}{s+6}+\frac{4sV_A}{5}+V_A=V_B##

##\frac{\frac{-28s}{s+6}+\frac{4sV_A}{5}+V_A-V_A}{4s}+\frac{\frac{-28s}{s+6}+\frac{4sV_A}{5}+V_A}{3}=0##

##\frac{-7s}{s+6}+\frac{V_A}{5}+\frac{-28s}{3s+18}+\frac{4sV_A}{15}+\frac{V_A}{3}=0##
Check the first term on the last line
 
gneill said:
Check the first term on the last line
##\frac{-7}{s+6}+\frac{V_A}{5}+\frac{-28s}{3s+18}+\frac{4sV_A}{15}+\frac{V_A}{3}=0##
##V_A(\frac{1}{5}+\frac{4s}{15}+\frac{1}{3})+\frac{-28s-21}{3s+18}=0##
##V_A(\frac{4s+8}{15})=\frac{28s+21}{3s+18}##
##V_A=\frac{28s+21}{3s+18}*\frac{15}{4s+8}##
 
Last edited:
gneill said:
Check the first term on the last line
Trying to get Vb instead of Va. Could you check my work? i(t) = VB/3, correct?
##\frac{V_B-V_C}{4s}+\frac{V_B}{3}=0##
##V_B-V_A+\frac{4sV_B}{3}##
##V_A=V_B+\frac{4sV_B}{3}##
sub into eqA
##-7e^{-6t}+\frac{V_B(1+\frac{4s}{3})}{5}+\frac{V_B(1+\frac{4s}{3})}{4s}##
simplify
##-7e^{-6t}+\frac{V_B}{5}+\frac{4sV_B}{15}+\frac{V_B}{4s}+\frac{V_B}{3}=0##
##-7e^{-6t}+\frac{8V_B+V_B4s}{15}+\frac{V_B}{4s}=0##
##\frac{8V_B+V_B4s}{15}+\frac{V_B}{4s}=7e^{-6t}##
mult everything by 60s
##32sV_B+16s^2V_B+15V_B=420se^{-6t}##
##e^{-6t} = \frac{1}{s+6}##
##32sV_B+16s^2V_B+15V_B=\frac{420s}{s+6}##

##V_B=\frac{420s}{(4s+3)(4s+5)(s+6)}##

Partial fraction decomp:
upload_2016-12-1_2-34-14.png


Inverse Laplace:
VB=
upload_2016-12-1_2-40-35.png


i(t)=VB/3 =
upload_2016-12-1_2-41-53.png


is this correct?
 
eehelp150 said:
Trying to get Vb instead of Va. Could you check my work? i(t) = VB/3, correct?
Yes, that's correct.
##\frac{V_B-V_C}{4s}+\frac{V_B}{3}=0##
##V_B-V_A+\frac{4sV_B}{3}##
##V_A=V_B+\frac{4sV_B}{3}##
sub into eqA
##-7e^{-6t}+\frac{V_B(1+\frac{4s}{3})}{5}+\frac{V_B(1+\frac{4s}{3})}{4s}##
Problem: You can't mix time-domain and Laplace domain functions. ##7e^{-6t}## doesn't belong here.
 
gneill said:
Yes, that's correct.

Problem: You can't mix time-domain and Laplace domain functions. ##7e^{-6t}## doesn't belong here.
I ended up getting VB=
upload_2016-12-1_3-23-6.png

i(s) = VB(s)/3 =
upload_2016-12-1_3-25-13.png


i(t)=
upload_2016-12-1_3-25-26.png


However, the answer should be:
upload_2016-12-1_3-24-58.png


Any idea what I'm doing wrong?

EDIT: I think I see my mistake. I will rework and post results
 
Last edited:
All I can tell is that your Laplace expression for VB has not turned out correctly. There's a lot of tedious algebra involved so you'll need to be very careful at each step.

I 'll admit that reviewing every line of algebra is not my favorite thing to do, so instead I'm going to give you a goal to work towards. The solution for VB(s) should be able to be expressed in the form:

##VB = A \frac{1}{(s+6)(s+2)}##, where A is a numeric constant.