How to Solve a Differential Equation Using Laplace Transforms?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saladsamurai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diff eq Laplace
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a differential equation using Laplace transforms, specifically the equation dx/dt + 3*x = exp(-3*t) with initial conditions set to zero. Participants are exploring the application of Laplace transforms and the associated properties, particularly in the context of inverse transforms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply Laplace transforms to the given differential equation but expresses confusion regarding the need for partial fraction expansion and the inverse Laplace transform of certain forms. Other participants discuss the shift property and its application, as well as the interpretation of the unit step function.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts of Laplace transforms and inverse transforms. Some have provided hints regarding the shift property and its implications for the original poster's problem. There is a recognition of the complexity involved in applying these concepts, particularly in the context of a Controls class.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of incomplete treatment of the mathematics in the course material, which may contribute to the participants' uncertainty. The original poster is seeking clarification on specific rules and properties related to Laplace transforms.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



Given:

dx/dt + 3*x = exp(-3*t) and all initial conditions are zero.

Homework Equations


Laplace

The Attempt at a Solution



L[dx/dt + 3*x = exp(-3*t)]

s*X(s) + 3*X(s) = 1 / (s + 3)

X(s) = 1 / (s + 3)^2

So here is where I get mixed up. For some reason, I thought I was supposed to use a partial fraction expansion here. But those of you who know better will probably get a good chuckle out of hearing about how I did do the partial fraction expansion only to re-discover that

X(s) = 1 / (s + 3)^2

So...2 questions:

1) Do you know why I thought I needed a PFE?

2) I have a list of Laplaces and their inverses. 1 / (s + a)^n is NOT one of them.

1 / (s + a) IS one of them.

I presume I am supposed to use this rule in conjunction with some other rule to find the inverse Laplace of 1 / (s + a)^n .
Can I get a hint on how to do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you had

X(s)=1/s2, you can easily get x(t)

So you'd need to apply the shift property.

You probably thought 1/(s+3)(s+3) would have given you something simpler, but it was already in its simplest form.:-p Don't worry, I've done that exacts same thing.
 
I will have to Google the "shift theory." This is for a Controls class, so the treatment of the mathematics is really brief and incomplete. So...I'll be back in a moment.

EDIT:So the shift theory is just

L-1[F(s − a)] = exp(at)*f(t)

I am not too sure how to use this. This is going to take a while :redface:Okay. I am looking at one of my old texts. I have that:

[tex]L[t*u(t)] = \frac{1}{s^2}[/tex]

where u(t) is the unit step function. What does that really mean? Is that just a fancy name for '1' ?

I also have the Frequency Shift Theorem :

[tex]L[e^{-at}f(t)] = F(s + a)[/tex]

so...
 
Last edited:
Saladsamurai said:
So the shift theory is just

L-1[F(s − a)] = exp(at)*f(t)

I am not too sure how to use this. This is going to take a while :redface:

Say you need to get

[tex]L^{-1} \left( \frac{3}{(s-1)^2+9} \right)[/tex]

You easily know that


[tex]L^{-1}\left( \frac{3}{s^2+9} \right)=sin3t[/tex]

So to get the require inverse transform, you need to shift the 's' to 's-1', and to do this you multiply the usual transform by e1t.
 
rock.freak667 said:
Say you need to get

[tex]L^{-1} \left( \frac{3}{(s-1)^2+9} \right)[/tex]

You easily know that[tex]L^{-1}\left( \frac{3}{s^2+9} \right)=sin3t[/tex]

So to get the require inverse transform, you need to shift the 's' to 's-1', and to do this you multiply the usual transform by e1t.
Hmmm...so it's simply

[tex]L^{-1} \left( \frac{3}{(s-1)^2+9} \right) = e^t*\sin(3t)[/tex]

?
 
So for my particular case:

F(s) = 1 / s^2 --> f(t) = t

and

F(s+a) = 1 / (s+3)^2 --> f(t) = exp(-3*t)*t

?
 
Saladsamurai said:
Hmmm...so it's simply

[tex]L^{-1} \left( \frac{3}{(s-1)^2+9} \right) = e^t*\sin(3t)[/tex]

?

Yep, the F(s-a) is your 3/((s-1)2+9), your f(t)=sin(3t) and your shift is -1, so it is et
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K