How to solve for distance give average velocity of magnitude

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the distance of a trip given an average velocity and a stop time. The original poster describes a scenario where a person travels south with an average velocity of 120.0 km/h, but the overall average velocity for the trip is 60.0 km/h, factoring in a 0.50-hour stop. The goal is to determine the total distance of the trip.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between total time, break time, and moving time, questioning how these relate to average velocities. There are attempts to set up equations based on the given velocities and times, with some participants expressing confusion over the correct application of these equations.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between the variables involved, with some participants suggesting different interpretations of the average velocities. Guidance has been offered regarding how to set up equations based on the known variables, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the variability of the homework values and the need to adapt equations accordingly. There is also mention of potential confusion regarding the units of time and distance in the context of the problem.

bthebiologist
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
I have changed the values, and the homework also changes every time I submit a response, I would just like to see an example worked out, so change the values as well if you want!

1. Homework Statement

A person takes a trip heading south with an average velocity of magnitude 120.0 km/h except for a 0.50h stop. Overall average velocity for the trip is 60.0 km/h. How far in km is the trip?

Homework Equations


Part of the homework was to come up with the relation between the 3 times, which I got right at
Toverall=-Tbreak+Ttrip

However I do not understand how this would help solve the problem.

The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried many different attempts, but the one I feel should work, just not sure how would be

120.0km/h = (60.0km/x(h))+(0.0km/(0.6h))

however this was not right, also tried using t=d/r
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bthebiologist said:
I have changed the values, and the homework also changes every time I submit a response, I would just like to see an example worked out, so change the values as well if you want!

1. Homework Statement

A person takes a trip heading south with an average velocity of magnitude 120.0 km/h except for a 0.50h stop. Overall average velocity for the trip is 60.0 km/h. How far in km is the trip?

Homework Equations


Part of the homework was to come up with the relation between the 3 times, which I got right at
Toverall=-Tbreak+Ttrip

However I do not understand how this would help solve the problem.

The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried many different attempts, but the one I feel should work, just not sure how would be

120.0km/h = (60.0km/x(h))+(0.0km/(0.6h))

however this was not right, also tried using t=d/r
Welcome to PF.
You have two things that are equal here. One involves the actual speed of the train with the stop. The other involves the average speed.
 
Hello Btb, welcome to PF :smile: !

Physicists (and mathematicians) have another way of ordering things. They say:
How do I call things?
What do I know ?
What equations do I have ?
What equations do I have to solve ?

Well, you have $$T_{\rm over all}, \quad T_{\rm break}, \quad T_{\rm moving}, \quad v_{\rm over all}, \quad v_{\rm break}, \quad v_{\rm moving} $$
What you know $$v_{\rm over all} = 120 \, {\rm mph}, \quad T_{\rm break} = 0.5\, {\rm h}, \quad v_{\rm break} = 0 \quad v_{\rm moving} = 120 \, {\rm mph} $$
[edit] sorry, km/h instead of mph. Makes the car possibility even more reasonable :smile:
Equations you have $$T_{\rm over all} = T_{\rm break} + T_{\rm moving} $$ $$ {\rm Distance} = v_{\rm over all}\, T_{\rm over all}
$$
With 7 variables, of which 4 known and 2 equations, you're still one short. What can it be ? Aha ! $$ {\rm Distance} = v_{\rm moving}\, T_{\rm moving } + v_{\rm break} \, T_{\rm break} $$
So all we have to solve for -- after substitution -- is one of the unknown T. From: $$v_{\rm moving}\, T_{\rm moving} = v_{\rm over all}\, T_{\rm over all} \quad {\rm and }$$ $$
T_{\rm over all} = T_{\rm break} + T_{\rm moving} $$
I'm sure you can work that out.
Borg assumes you travel by train. So no speeding tickets.
 
Last edited:
BvU said:
Borg assumes you travel by train. So no speeding tickets.
Nice catch. Clearly I didn't read close enough. :eek:
 
BvU said:
Hello Btb, welcome to PF :smile: !

Physicists (and mathematicians) have another way of ordering things. They say:
How do I call things?
What do I know ?
What equations do I have ?
What equations do I have to solve ?

Well, you have $$T_{\rm over all}, \quad T_{\rm break}, \quad T_{\rm moving}, \quad v_{\rm over all}, \quad v_{\rm break}, \quad v_{\rm moving} $$
What you know $$v_{\rm over all} = 120 \, {\rm mph}, \quad T_{\rm break} = 0.5\, {\rm h}, \quad v_{\rm break} = 0 \quad v_{\rm moving} = 120 \, {\rm mph} $$
Equations you have $$T_{\rm over all} = T_{\rm break} + T_{\rm moving} $$ $$ {\rm Distance} = v_{\rm over all}\, T_{\rm over all}
$$
With 7 variables, of which 4 known and 2 equations, you're still one short. What can it be ? Aha ! $$ {\rm Distance} = v_{\rm moving}\, T_{\rm moving } + v_{\rm break} \, T_{\rm break} $$
So all we have to solve for -- after substitution -- is one of the unknown T. From: $$v_{\rm moving}\, T_{\rm moving} = v_{\rm over all}\, T_{\rm over all} \quad {\rm and }$$ $$
T_{\rm over all} = T_{\rm break} + T_{\rm moving} $$
I'm sure you can work that out.
Borg assumes you travel by train. So no speeding tickets.

Okay so I think, but may be wrong, that Voverall should be 60.0km/h not 120km/h, so my equations would be

(60.0km/h)(xh-0.5h)=(120km/h)(xh)
and
xh=(xh-0.5)+0.5h

I am guessing that the substitution would be to put (xh-0.5h)+0.5h into the equation where xh is.
Therefore

(60.0km/h)[{(xh-0.5h)+0.5h}-0.5h)=(120km/h)[(xh-0.5h)+0.5h]

Which would reduce to (60.0km/h)(-0.5xh^2+0.25h^2-0.25h^2)=(120km/h)(0.5xh^2-0.25h^2)

Then (60km/h)(-0.5xh^2)=(120km/h)(0.5xh^2-0.25h^2)

but x's would cancel out leaving me with 60km/h=120km/h(+0.25h^2)?

I guess I am just lost as to what we are subsituting, the whole question makes sense to me we are just trying to figure out how long we would need to travel at 120km/h to make our average speed 60km/h since grandma had to use the bathroom for half an hour

So to me this make sense to me -> 60km/h(t)=(120km/h)(t-0.5)+(0km/h)(0.5)
which is 60km/h(t)=(120km/h)(t-0.5)
but all the hours and kilometers are confusing me. is 60km/h(t) = 60km(th) and (120km/h)(t-0.5)= 120km(th)-60km?
 
bthebiologist said:
Okay so I think, but may be wrong, that Voverall should be 60.0km/h not 120km/h, so my equations would be

(60.0km/h)(xh-0.5h)=(120km/h)(xh)
and
xh=(xh-0.5)+0.5h

I am guessing that the substitution would be to put (xh-0.5h)+0.5h into the equation where xh is.
Therefore

(60.0km/h)[{(xh-0.5h)+0.5h}-0.5h)=(120km/h)[(xh-0.5h)+0.5h]

Which would reduce to (60.0km/h)(-0.5xh^2+0.25h^2-0.25h^2)=(120km/h)(0.5xh^2-0.25h^2)

Then (60km/h)(-0.5xh^2)=(120km/h)(0.5xh^2-0.25h^2)

but x's would cancel out leaving me with 60km/h=120km/h(+0.25h^2)?

I guess I am just lost as to what we are subsituting, the whole question makes sense to me we are just trying to figure out how long we would need to travel at 120km/h to make our average speed 60km/h since grandma had to use the bathroom for half an hourSo to me this make sense to me -> 60km/h(t)=(120km/h)(t-0.5)+(0km/h)(0.5)
which is 60km/h(t)=(120km/h)(t-0.5)
but all the hours and kilometers are confusing me. is 60km/h(t) = 60km(th) and (120km/h)(t-0.5)= 120km(th)-60km?

You are making it WAAAY too complicated and lengthy. Just let x = distance traveled (in km) and t = traveling time (in hours); this is the time actually spent moving. The total trip time is T = t + 0.5. We are given 120 = x/t and 60 = x/(t+0.5), so we have two equations in the two unknowns x and t. We can use the first equation to write x in terms of t: x = 120 * t, and putting that into the second equation gives an equation involving t alone.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bthebiologist
Ray Vickson said:
You are making it WAAAY too complicated and lengthy. Just let x = distance traveled (in km) and t = traveling time (in hours); this is the time actually spent moving. The total trip time is T = t + 0.5. We are given 120 = x/t and 60 = x/(t+0.5), so we have two equations in the two unknowns x and t. We can use the first equation to write x in terms of t: x = 120 * t, and putting that into the second equation gives an equation involving t alone.

Okay so we have 60=(120*t)/(t+0.5)
60 (t+0.5)=120*t
60t+30=120t
30=60?
Not sure how to keep t since it would naturally cancel.
 
bthebiologist said:
Okay so we have 60=(120*t)/(t+0.5)
60 (t+0.5)=120*t
60t+30=120t
30=60?
Not sure how to keep t since it would naturally cancel.
There is no 't' with the 30 so the t's don't all cancel.
 
Borg said:
There is no 't' with the 30 so the t's don't all cancel.
Ah crap. So 30=60t so 0.5=t

So 120=x/0.5 -> 60= x
And 60=x/(0.5+0.5) -> 60=x

So is my total time = 1hr, drive time =0.5h
With distance being 0.5h (120km/h) = 60km traveled?
 
  • #10
bthebiologist said:
Ah crap. So 30=60t so 0.5=t

So 120=x/0.5 -> 60= x
And 60=x/(0.5+0.5) -> 60=x

So is my total time = 1hr, drive time =0.5h
With distance being 0.5h (120km/h) = 60km traveled?
Yes, that's correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bthebiologist
  • #11
Borg said:
Yes, that's correct.
OH GOD THANK YOU JESUS! Thank you guys (gals?) So much! Onto the next question... :/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Borg
  • #12
bthebiologist said:
I guess I am just lost as to what we are subsituting, the whole question makes sense to me we are just trying to figure out how long we would need to travel at 120km/h to make our average speed 60km/h since grandma had to use the bathroom for half an hour

So to me this make sense to me -> 60km/h(t)=(120km/h)(t-0.5)+(0km/h)(0.5)
which is 60km/h(t)=(120km/h)(t-0.5)
but all the hours and kilometers are confusing me. is 60km/h(t) = 60km(th) and (120km/h)(t-0.5)= 120km(th)-60km?
One more reason to work with symbols as long as reasonable. There were two equations left over with two unknowns, remember?$$
v_{\rm moving}\, T_{\rm moving} = v_{\rm over all}\, T_{\rm over all} \quad {\rm and }$$ $$
T_{\rm over all} = T_{\rm break} + T_{\rm moving} $$ let's get rid of ##T_{\rm over all}## and write $$
v_{\rm moving}\, T_{\rm moving} = v_{\rm over all}\, \left ( T_{\rm break} + T_{\rm moving} \right ) $$ so that
$$ \left ( v_{\rm moving} - v_{\rm over all} \right ) \, T_{\rm moving} = v_{\rm over all} \, T_{\rm break} $$
and therefore $$
T_{\rm moving} = T_{\rm break} \, { v_{\rm over all}\,\over v_{\rm moving} - v_{\rm over all} } $$
And now that you have an unknown on the left and all the stuff on the right is known, it's time to fill in some stuff.

Ray already said it: don't mix up values and dimensions.

-- slow typst. I see you're all done already :frown: but some example in dealing with equations may be useful, nevertheless.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bthebiologist

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
21K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K