How to Solve IGCSE Lens q with Unspecified Distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter S2100595
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Igcse Lens
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving an IGCSE lens question where the distance from the beam to the lens is unspecified, only the beam's height is provided. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the problem's details, specifically the beam's width of 1.0 cm and the need to determine distances on the other side of the lens where the beam width changes. Clarification is provided that a sketch diagram is necessary for visualizing the problem, and participants are reminded to follow forum rules when posting. There is also a note on the importance of showing work or intentions for solving the problem to receive further assistance. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for careful reading of the problem and adherence to forum guidelines.
S2100595
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Could you please help me to figure out this question? The answer scheme says i) should be between 0 and 5.6 cm and ii) should be beyond 5.6 cm.
Relevant Equations
Not applicable
I know a sketch diagram is required for the question but they haven't specified the distance from the beam to the lens. They've just given the height of the beam. So how do I know how far I should place the object? Should the object (beam) be at infinity?
Screenshot (1877).png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Read the problem. It clearly states that the width of the beam before it reaches the lens is 1.0 cm. So the question is to find the distance(s) on the other side of the lens where the beam is less or more than 1.0 cm. Should you require additional help, our rules require that you show some work or at least how you intend to answer this question.
 
kuruman said:
Read the problem. It clearly states that the width of the beam before it reaches the lens is 1.0 cm. So the question is to find the distance(s) on the other side of the lens where the beam is less or more than 1.0 cm. Should you require additional help, our rules require that you show some work or at least how you intend to answer this question.
I have re-written how I intend to solve it
 
S2100595 said:
I have re-written how I intend to solve it
Please don't edit your original post if you wish to reply. It could be confusing and is bad form. Start a new post. If you intend to draw a sketch, then draw one and post it. Mind the statement of the problem that says "A beam of parallel light strikes a converging lens of focal length 2.8 cm." What distance do you need to be given to draw a sketch of that?
 
Alright never mind. This is my first post and I didn't realize there are so many restrictions and rules about how I can post on this forum.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Back
Top