How to Solve IGCSE Lens q with Unspecified Distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter S2100595
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Igcse Lens
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving an IGCSE lens question where the distance from the beam to the lens is unspecified, only the beam's height is provided. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the problem's details, specifically the beam's width of 1.0 cm and the need to determine distances on the other side of the lens where the beam width changes. Clarification is provided that a sketch diagram is necessary for visualizing the problem, and participants are reminded to follow forum rules when posting. There is also a note on the importance of showing work or intentions for solving the problem to receive further assistance. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for careful reading of the problem and adherence to forum guidelines.
S2100595
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Could you please help me to figure out this question? The answer scheme says i) should be between 0 and 5.6 cm and ii) should be beyond 5.6 cm.
Relevant Equations
Not applicable
I know a sketch diagram is required for the question but they haven't specified the distance from the beam to the lens. They've just given the height of the beam. So how do I know how far I should place the object? Should the object (beam) be at infinity?
Screenshot (1877).png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Read the problem. It clearly states that the width of the beam before it reaches the lens is 1.0 cm. So the question is to find the distance(s) on the other side of the lens where the beam is less or more than 1.0 cm. Should you require additional help, our rules require that you show some work or at least how you intend to answer this question.
 
kuruman said:
Read the problem. It clearly states that the width of the beam before it reaches the lens is 1.0 cm. So the question is to find the distance(s) on the other side of the lens where the beam is less or more than 1.0 cm. Should you require additional help, our rules require that you show some work or at least how you intend to answer this question.
I have re-written how I intend to solve it
 
S2100595 said:
I have re-written how I intend to solve it
Please don't edit your original post if you wish to reply. It could be confusing and is bad form. Start a new post. If you intend to draw a sketch, then draw one and post it. Mind the statement of the problem that says "A beam of parallel light strikes a converging lens of focal length 2.8 cm." What distance do you need to be given to draw a sketch of that?
 
Alright never mind. This is my first post and I didn't realize there are so many restrictions and rules about how I can post on this forum.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Back
Top