How to synchronize the RF source having delay over time?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the synchronization of an RF power supply with a digital delay generator, particularly focusing on methods suitable for an aperiodic RF source. Participants explore various synchronization techniques, including phase locked loops and edge-controlled phase detectors, while seeking clarification on the specific application and characteristics of the RF source.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using a phase locked loop (PLL) for synchronization, noting its common use for periodic signals but questioning its applicability to an aperiodic source.
  • Another participant proposes an edge-controlled phase detector as an ideal method for detecting phase differences and applying them to a delay generator, while expressing difficulty in finding suitable products.
  • Several participants seek clarification on the nature of the RF power supply and its application, asking about the specific characteristics of the RF source and the intended synchronization goals.
  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the synchronization of aperiodic signals, questioning whether it involves prediction or demodulation.
  • Another participant discusses the sampling process with an electrical probe and the timing of measurements relative to the RF generator's zero-crossings.
  • A participant summarizes the differences between synchronizing periodic and aperiodic signals, suggesting that the latter may involve simpler triggering processes rather than full synchronization.
  • There is mention of the necessity of using integrated circuits for PLL control unless a discrete component solution is feasible.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the applicability of different synchronization methods, particularly regarding the use of PLLs for aperiodic signals. There is no consensus on the best approach, and multiple competing views remain regarding the synchronization of RF sources.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for further context regarding the RF power generator's specifications and the specific application to better understand the synchronization challenges. There are unresolved questions about the nature of the RF source and the precise requirements for synchronization.

K-Manu
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
RF source synchronization method
I want to synchronize the RF power supply (having jitter or delay over temp/time) to RF reference frequency with a digital delay generator, and I thought of two ways.

1) phase locked loop: it is commonly used for synchronizing the high-frequency signal, but as I know it is proper for a periodic AC source, and mine is an aperiodic source.

2) Edge-controlled phase detector: Detected phase difference between two sources and applying it to a delay generator would be the idealized method. But I could not find proper user-friendly products (IC is not proper because I'm poor at that).

or there would be a better way to solve it. Please share your experience and correct my knowledge. :)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I need some context.
What is "the RF power supply" ?
What is the HF RF source ?
What are you trying to synchronize what with ?
Why are you wanting to do that ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
Baluncore said:
I need some context.
What is "the RF power supply" ?
What is the HF RF source ?
What are you trying to synchronize what with ?
Why are you wanting to do that ?

I'm using the RF(13.56 MHz) power generator (power supply) having delay, and I wanna synchronize RF signal what I made using digital delay generator with power generator to make a pulse signal as used to external trigger.
 
Is this RF being used for 13.56 MHz ISM (industrial, scientific or medical) dielectric heating?
What is your application?

Newer ISM equipment employs a signal generator, followed by a linear power amplifier.
Older ISM equipment employs a free running, class C oscillator, are you trying to lock that to a precise frequency?
What is the power, make and model of the 13.56 MHz RF power generator?

The answer will become obvious, once we identify the meaning of the question.
 
Baluncore said:
Is this RF being used for 13.56 MHz ISM (industrial, scientific or medical) dielectric heating?
What is your application?

Newer ISM equipment employs a signal generator, followed by a linear power amplifier.
Older ISM equipment employs a free running, class C oscillator, are you trying to lock that to a precise frequency?
What is the power, make and model of the 13.56 MHz RF power generator?

The answer will become obvious, once we identify the meaning of the question.
Sorry to what I didn't mention about detaill information, (because I thought it was not essential.)

An RF power generator is used for gas discharge, and I wanna measure its characteristic it (via electrical probe) at the specific moment (<10 ns) in an RF period. Thus I wanna insert the external trigger signal into my electrical probe using a delay generator.

RF input Power: 170, voltage: 300-1000 V, current 0.1-0.5 mA (roughly)
 
K-Manu said:
mine is an aperiodic source.
This is where I get confused. Say V = V0 + f(t). As you say, if f(t) is a sine wave, a PLL is a common solution,. But you say f(t) is not periodic - so doesn't that mean synchronization has to predict what f(t) will be?

Or are you really talking demodulation? (And possibly a modulation after that)
 
Will you sample with the electrical probe, at every positive zero-crossing of the RF generator, or less often?
How often can the electrical probe take a sample?
 
K-Manu said:
TL;DR Summary: RF source synchronization method

phase locked loop: it is commonly used for synchronizing the high-frequency signal, but as I know it is proper for a periodic AC source, and mine is an aperiodic source.
According to my limited understanding, in a generally simple system, only two periodic signals can be synchronized. This method uses the output of the phase comparator for feedback control, ultimately changing the frequency and phase of one periodic signal so that it is the same frequency as the other periodic signal, and the phase difference of the two periodic signals also remains constant. In this case, the phase comparator can be analog or digital.

Synchronization of non-periodic signals is beyond my knowledge. I think this should belong to a higher level of scientific research, and I would like to know more.

If you want to control the timing relationship between a periodic signal and another non-periodic signal (or between two aperiodic signals) in a simple system , I think it can simply be called a signal triggering process, which is different from two periodic signals being completely synchronized.

K-Manu said:
TL;DR Summary: RF source synchronization method

Edge-controlled phase detector: Detected phase difference between two sources and applying it to a delay generator would be the idealized method. But I could not find proper user-friendly products (IC is not proper because I'm poor at that)
I don't know the actual specifications and control methods of your RF power generator. Is there an input to control its frequency or do you just want to use a trigger signal to have it provide power to discharge the gas once

Regardless, if you want PLL control, using an IC seems necessary unless you have the ability to make a PLL control circuit using discrete components. :smile:
 
Of course, we can easily generate two synchronized periodic or even aperiodic signals by passing one signal through a delay generator to trigger another signal, but this does not require a phase locked loop.

If we need to change the frequency and phase of an existing periodic signal to synchronize it with another periodic signal, we can use phase locked loop, which requires a process of phase comparison and negative feedback to complete the task.

They are two essentially different processes suitable for different applications.:wideeyed:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
15K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 128 ·
5
Replies
128
Views
34K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K