Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the synthesis of alkenes using the Corey House reaction, specifically focusing on the reaction of cyclohex-2-ene-1-one with dimethylcuprate (##(CH3)_2CuLi##). Participants explore the mechanism and application of Gilman reagents in this context, while addressing homework-related queries.
Discussion Character
- Homework-related
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant expresses uncertainty about how to proceed with the reaction since there is no halogen present in the compound.
- Another participant requests to see the effort made by the original poster (OP) to solve the problem, suggesting that even seemingly trivial attempts are welcome.
- There is a suggestion to compare the reactions of unsaturated cyclic rings with Grignard reagents and Gilman reagents to gain insight.
- One participant proposes that the double bond in the compound will be attacked by the methyl group from the Gilman reagent, indicating a potential pathway for the reaction.
- Another participant confirms the previous claim about the methyl group attacking the double bond and discusses the resonance structure of cyclohexane, suggesting that the beta carbon is electron deficient.
- A question is raised about why the methyl group attacks the beta carbon instead of the carbonyl carbon, indicating a need for further clarification on the mechanism.
- Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the mechanism before providing direct answers to the OP's queries.
- One participant suggests reviewing the Michael reaction for clues related to the mechanism.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally agree that the methyl group from the Gilman reagent attacks the double bond, but there is no consensus on the detailed mechanism or the reasoning behind the specific attack on the beta carbon. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the full understanding of the reaction mechanism.
Contextual Notes
Participants have not provided complete details on their assumptions or prior knowledge, and there are unresolved questions about the mechanism of the reaction. The discussion reflects varying levels of understanding among participants.