How to tell if my trend is real?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kop442000
  • Start date Start date
kop442000
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I'm working on a research project that looks at the amount of cosmic rays coming out of a particular region of the sky in certain time intervals.

There are 13 readings taken:

9,9,6,6,7,1,6,6,1,6,4,1,0

When this is plotted, it looks like a downward trend - meaning the source could be becoming less active - but it's difficult to say with such small statistics.

I though perhaps I should try to quantify the likelihood of getting such numbers if the source was essentially a constant source - ie the trend is just due to fluctuations.

Could someone please suggest how I might think about doing this?

Thanks in advance for any suggestions!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Browsing the various named statistical tests on the web, the Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient is only relevant one I found.

Usually when people state real world problems involving probability they leave out a lot of information. In my opinion, if you want a good answer to a real world problem you should try to make a probability model of it that incorporates most of your knowledge. (For example, you probably know whether those numbers are discrete "counts" from a detector or continouous quantities that have been rounded off, whether there is a reasonable upper limit for the numbers, whether there are other associated known variables that might affect the counts such as the position of the detector and what kind of errors the detector might make.) Think about it as if you were going to write a computer simulation of the process, even if you don't actually do that.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
87
Views
9K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top