How to think about extensive and intensive properties?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tellmesomething
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basic thermodynamics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the classification of properties in thermodynamics, specifically extensive and intensive properties. Participants explore definitions, examples, and the implications of these classifications in various contexts, including pressure and density.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants explain that intensive properties remain consistent for both a population and a sample, while extensive properties are only consistent for the sample.
  • Examples provided include hydrochloric acid concentration as an intensive property and the amount of substance as an extensive property.
  • There is a question about how pressure can be viewed as either intensive or extensive, depending on the setup and conditions, such as whether the gas is partitioned or if more gas is added to a container.
  • Some participants argue that not every property can be classified as intrinsically extensive or intensive, citing mass as extensive and density as intensive, while length and pressure can vary based on context.
  • Concerns are raised about textbook questions that ask for classifications without sufficient context, leading to ambiguity in answers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the classification of certain properties, particularly pressure, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain. The discussion does not reach a consensus on how to classify properties without specific context.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the classification of properties can depend on specific conditions and setups, leading to uncertainty in categorization. There is also mention of the need for precise descriptions in questions to avoid ambiguity.

Chemistry news on Phys.org
Which part of the post you don't understand, it seems reasonably straightforward.
 
Intensive properties are consistent for a population or a sample, extensive properties are only consistent for the sample.

For example, if I have 1 L of 1 M hydrochloric acid (population) and I take out 500 mL (half), my sample will still have the concentration of 1 M. Therefore, it is an intensive property.

If I instead consider the amount of substance, my sample of 500 mL will only contain half the substance of the population.

You can replace population/sample with whole/part.
 
Mayhem said:
Intensive properties are consistent for a population or a sample, extensive properties are only consistent for the sample.

For example, if I have 1 L of 1 M hydrochloric acid (population) and I take out 500 mL (half), my sample will still have the concentration of 1 M. Therefore, it is an intensive property.

If I instead consider the amount of substance, my sample of 500 mL will only contain half the substance of the population.

You can replace population/sample with whole/part.
Thankyou!! But can you expand on the pressure example why can I not think of it as the moles being doubled in a container whose volume is constant? I.e increasing pressure by increasing mass.

Or to consider it to be a valid property like you mentioned I would have to compare the pressure of a part of the gas sample with the whole gas sample?
 
Not every property classifies as intrinsically extensive or intensive.

Mass - obviously extensive.

Density (edit: of liquid or solid) - obviously intensive.

Length? Well, you can add some restrictions so that the length becomes an extensive property (say "length of a gauge 32 wire made of material"), but in general length is impossible to classify. Similarly with pressure - you can add restrictions to the setup that will make the pressure an intensive property (when you split tank in half, the pressure is identical in each part of the tank), but you can also make a setup in which pressure becomes an extensive property (adding more ideal gas to the tank increases the pressure linearly, so the value depends on the amount of material).
 
Last edited:
Borek said:
Not every property classifies as intrinsically extensive or intensive.

Mass - obviously extensive.

Density - obviously intensive.

Length? Well, you can add some restrictions so that the length becomes an extensive property (say "length of a gauge 32 wire made of material"), but in general length is impossible to classify. Similarly with pressure - you can add restrictions to the setup that will make the pressure an intensive property (when you split tank in half, the pressure is identical in each part of the tank), but you can also make a setup in which pressure becomes an extensive property (adding more ideal gas to the tank increases the pressure linearly, so the value depends on the amount of material).
But textbooks ask questions like state the extensive and intensive properties among so & so options which includes pressure. In that case...?
 
Pressure is dependent on temperature (for gases, at least) and temperature is a statistic of average kinetic energy of a particle. If the temperature is uniform in your container, then so is the pressure. Therefore, any part of such a gas should have the same pressure if partitioned into a smaller container.
 
tellmesomething said:
But textbooks ask questions like state the extensive and intensive properties among so & so options which includes pressure. In that case...?

In that case you need to take into account the description of the case, as the answer can be either intensive or extensive, depending on the setup.

If there is no precise description the question is poorly asked (and most likely expects you to answer "intensive", even if in general that's not always the correct answer).
 
Mayhem said:
Pressure is dependent on temperature (for gases, at least) and temperature is a statistic of average kinetic energy of a particle. If the temperature is uniform in your container, then so is the pressure. Therefore, any part of such a gas should have the same pressure if partitioned into a smaller container.
I see okay... Thankyou!
 
  • #10
Borek said:
In that case you need to take into account the description of the case, as the answer can be either intensive or extensive, depending on the setup.

If there is no precise description the question is poorly asked (and most likely expects you to answer "intensive", even if in general that's not always the correct answer).
Okay Thankyou!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
9K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K