How to turn partition sum into an integral?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on evaluating the partition function Z_tot in the limit where kT is much greater than ε. The original sum is approximated by an integral, but concerns are raised about the absence of a factor of j that could be replaced with dj. It is clarified that by expressing "1" in terms of the summation index j, a factor can indeed be introduced, allowing the transition from summation to integration. This method demonstrates how the integral can approximate the sum effectively. The explanation resolves the initial confusion regarding the dimensionality and correctness of the approximation.
LightPhoton
Messages
42
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
How to evaluate partition sum in the limit where $$kT\gg\epsilon$$
Relevant Equations
$$Z_{tot}=\sum_0^\infty (2j+1)e^{-j(j+1)\epsilon/kT}$$
In, *An Introduction to Thermal Physics, page 235*, Schroder wants to evaluate the partition function

$$Z_{tot}=\sum_0^\infty (2j+1)e^{-j(j+1)\epsilon/kT}$$

in the limit that $kT\gg\epsilon$, thus he writes

$$Z_{tot}\approx\int_0^\infty (2j+1)e^{-j(j+1)\epsilon/kT}\,dj$$

But how is this correct? There was no factor of $j$ in the sum that could be replaced with $dj$. Also, it is good that $j$ is just a number, otherwise even the dimensions of $Z_{tot}$ would be wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LightPhoton said:
There was no factor of ##j## in the sum that could be replaced with ##dj##.
Yes, there is such a factor if you express "##1##" in terms of the summation index "##j##":$$Z_{tot}=\sum_{0}^{\infty}(2j+1)e^{-j(j+1)\epsilon/kT}\times1=\sum_{0}^{\infty}(2j+1)e^{-j(j+1)\epsilon/kT}\left((j+1)-j\right)\equiv\sum_{0}^{\infty}(2j+1)e^{-j(j+1)\epsilon/kT}\triangle j$$Now can you see how the integral approximates the sum?
 
  • Like
Likes LightPhoton
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top