How to turn partition sum into an integral?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the evaluation of the partition function \(Z_{tot}=\sum_0^\infty (2j+1)e^{-j(j+1)\epsilon/kT}\) as presented in *An Introduction to Thermal Physics*. The approximation \(Z_{tot}\approx\int_0^\infty (2j+1)e^{-j(j+1)\epsilon/kT}\,dj\) is validated by expressing the summation index \(j\) in terms of a differential element, specifically \((j+1)-j\), allowing the transformation of the sum into an integral. This method effectively demonstrates how the integral serves as an approximation for the discrete sum under the condition \(kT\gg\epsilon\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partition functions in statistical mechanics
  • Familiarity with the concepts of integrals and summations
  • Knowledge of the Boltzmann factor \(e^{-E/kT}\)
  • Basic principles of thermal physics as outlined in *An Introduction to Thermal Physics*
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of partition functions in statistical mechanics
  • Learn about the relationship between sums and integrals in mathematical physics
  • Explore the implications of the condition \(kT\gg\epsilon\) on physical systems
  • Investigate the use of differential elements in approximating discrete sums
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying statistical mechanics, as well as researchers interested in the mathematical techniques for approximating sums with integrals.

LightPhoton
Messages
42
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
How to evaluate partition sum in the limit where $$kT\gg\epsilon$$
Relevant Equations
$$Z_{tot}=\sum_0^\infty (2j+1)e^{-j(j+1)\epsilon/kT}$$
In, *An Introduction to Thermal Physics, page 235*, Schroder wants to evaluate the partition function

$$Z_{tot}=\sum_0^\infty (2j+1)e^{-j(j+1)\epsilon/kT}$$

in the limit that $kT\gg\epsilon$, thus he writes

$$Z_{tot}\approx\int_0^\infty (2j+1)e^{-j(j+1)\epsilon/kT}\,dj$$

But how is this correct? There was no factor of $j$ in the sum that could be replaced with $dj$. Also, it is good that $j$ is just a number, otherwise even the dimensions of $Z_{tot}$ would be wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LightPhoton said:
There was no factor of ##j## in the sum that could be replaced with ##dj##.
Yes, there is such a factor if you express "##1##" in terms of the summation index "##j##":$$Z_{tot}=\sum_{0}^{\infty}(2j+1)e^{-j(j+1)\epsilon/kT}\times1=\sum_{0}^{\infty}(2j+1)e^{-j(j+1)\epsilon/kT}\left((j+1)-j\right)\equiv\sum_{0}^{\infty}(2j+1)e^{-j(j+1)\epsilon/kT}\triangle j$$Now can you see how the integral approximates the sum?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LightPhoton

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
727
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K