Chemistry How to understand the energy involved in mass transfer into an open system?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the energy involved in mass transfer into an open system, highlighting key equations related to energy dynamics. The energy required to push mass into the system is expressed through force and area, while the energy transferred across system boundaries is detailed in terms of internal energy, kinetic energy, and potential energy. The net energy from mass transfer is calculated by summing various energy components and multiplying by the total number of moles. The General Accounting Equation is introduced to relate energy transfer, generation, and conversion, emphasizing the first law of thermodynamics. Ultimately, the discussion seeks clarity on the derivation of net energy from mass transfer and its implications in energy accounting.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
Consider the flow of a constant volume of mass (a closed system) into an open system as shown in the first figure below.
Relevant Equations
The initial energy of the closed system is ##(U+E_K+E_P)_i## and the final energy is ##(U+E_K+E_P)_f##.
1726362334802.png


The following is what is written in the book I am reading.

The energy required to "push" the mass into the system is

$$F\delta z=PA\delta z=PV\tag{1}$$

in which ##V## is the molar volume of the closed system, ##F## is the acting force, ##A## is the cross-sectional area, and ##\delta z## is the width of the system.

The necessary energy transferred across the boundaries of the open system is

$$E_{mt}=(U+E_K+E_P)_f=(U+E_K+E_P)_i+PV\tag{2}$$

and the net energy per mole caused by the mass transfer is

$$Net\ E_{mt}=\sum(U+PV+E_K+E_P)\tag{3}$$

To obtain the total net energy, multiply (3) by the total number of moles.

Finally we can collect all our energy transfer terms:

$$TRANS=\sum Q+\sum W+\sum (U+PV+E_K+E_P)_{mt}\tag{4}$$

My question is: how is (3) obtained?

For a bit more clarity, this book is discussing energy in the context of accounting. They introduce the "General Accounting Equation"

$$ACCumulation=TRANSfer+GENeration+CONVersion\tag{5}$$

To use this equation, w define the system, select the countable property of interest, and apply equation (5).

##TRANS, GEN,## and ##CONV## terms are net quantities.

Transfer represents input minus output across the boundaries of the system.
Generation represents production-less destruction within the system.
Conversion represents appearance-less disappearance within the system (interchange of the countable quantity among separately identifiable forms).

Accumulation occurs over some stated period of time, the accounting period, during which the system passes from an initial state to a final state.

When we apply GAE to energy we obtain a mathematical statement of the first law.

$$ACC=E_f-E_i=\Delta (U+E_K+E_P)_{SYS}$$

The TRANS term is composed of energy transferred as heat, energy transferred as work, and energy transferred by mass.

As far as I understand, the TRANS term is the ##U## term. This is a "catch-all" term called internal energy (energy that the system possesses because it is composed of energetic particles).

Note that the notation in this book uses capital letters to denote molar properties.

The total energy of a system is then

$$nE=nU+nE_K+nE_P$$

which we can simplify to

$$E=U+E_K+E_P$$

where ##E_K## is molar kinetic energy of the system (motion of the system relative to some reference frame) and ##E_P## is molar potential energy of the system (energy due to interaction with some external field).

Considering just the ##U## term, as mentioned above, this can be changed by means of heat, work, or mass transfer.

Heat is a path function and is transferred via conduction, convection, and/or radiation.

Work is a "catch all" energy transfer mechanism: it is all the energy crossing the boundaries of the system caused by any driving force other than temperature but excluding mass transfer.

I understand calculations of heat and work, but this post is about calculations involving energy transfer via mass.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top