How to use contour, complex analysis to solve integrals?

Click For Summary
Contour integration is a method used to evaluate integrals, particularly those involving complex functions, such as the integral of sin(x)/x from negative to positive infinity. To apply contour integration, one typically selects a closed contour, often a semicircle in the upper half-plane, to avoid singularities, particularly at x=0. The integral along the entire contour is zero, allowing the evaluation of the integral along the real line by considering contributions from the semicircular paths. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding contours and singularities in complex analysis, emphasizing that a deeper study of the topic is necessary for clarity. Proper resources and examples are recommended for those new to contour integration.
Amad27
Messages
409
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{\sin(x)}{x} using Complex Analysis

Homework Equations



Contour analysis on \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{\sin(x)}{x}

The Attempt at a Solution



Hello,

I am completely new to contour integration. I would really appreciate it if someone can walk me through contour integration. And residues and how to perform contour integration.

So first we choose a contour. What are the guidelines for choosing a contour? Does it matter?

Thanks, for helping me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, first you need a contour! And it is simplest to use a closed contour. Since you can't, technically, have a contour "at infinity", choose some number "R" and consider the integral \int_{-R}^R \frac{sin(x)}{x}dx. Circular contours are typically easiest to work with so we might close the contour by taking the semi-circle, from R to -R in the upper half plane. There will be a problem at x= 0 where the is a (removable) singularity. You might, then, change the line from -R to R by taking a small semi-circle, of radius "r", say, from -r to r, also in the upper half plane.

Then there will be no singularities inside the contour so the integral around the entire contour is 0. You can then say that the integral around the contour is the integral, on the real line, from -R to r and from r to R, plus the integral around the semi-circle with radius R plus the integral around the semi-circle with radius r and that sum is 0. You should be able to show that the integral around the semi-circle with radius R has limit 0 as R goes to infinity so your original integral is the negative of the limit of the integral around the semi-circle of radius r, as r goes to 0.
 
Hello @HallsofIvy, thanks for the pleasant reply! Will you advise me with something?

How does the circular contour give area of the function from negative infinity to infinity? Why do you need a "circle," anyway?

We go:

-R \to 0 and then 0 \to R[/itex] then finally, R \to -R<br /> <br /> Here is what I don&#039;t understand. why do we need to go from R \to -R if we already have it going from -R \to R<br /> <br /> Or is the integral in the end:<br /> <br /> I = Full length - length of curvature (not diameter) = diameter <br /> <br /> But then again, how does length give area? Thanks HallsofIvy!
 
Amad27 said:
Hello @HallsofIvy, thanks for the pleasant reply! Will you advise me with something?

How does the circular contour give area of the function from negative infinity to infinity? Why do you need a "circle," anyway?

We go:

-R \to 0 and then 0 \to R[/itex] then finally, R \to -R<br /> <br /> Here is what I don&#039;t understand. why do we need to go from R \to -R if we already have it going from -R \to R<br /> <br /> Or is the integral in the end:<br /> <br /> I = Full length - length of curvature (not diameter) = diameter<br /> <br /> But then again, how does length give area? Thanks HallsofIvy!
<br /> <br /> You are suffering from many mis-conceptions about contour integration, so much so that I think you cannot really hope to learn it in a few PF postings. You really need to read up on it in a lengthier treatment. See. eg.,<br /> <br /> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methods_of_contour_integration" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow ugc noopener">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methods_of_contour_integration</a> or<br /> http://web.williams.edu/Mathematics/sjmiller/public_html/372/coursenotes/Trapper_MethodsContourIntegrals.pdf or<br /> <a href="https://www.math.ust.hk/~maykwok/courses/ma304/06_07/Complex_4.pdf" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow ugc noopener">https://www.math.ust.hk/~maykwok/courses/ma304/06_07/Complex_4.pdf</a><br /> <br /> The first link is to a summary; the second link has numerous examples similar to yours (but assumes some background theory already); the third link is to a complete treatment of the subject, giving all the basic results and developing the methods.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
Well, first you need a contour! And it is simplest to use a closed contour. Since you can't, technically, have a contour "at infinity", choose some number "R" and consider the integral \int_{-R}^R \frac{sin(x)}{x}dx. Circular contours are typically easiest to work with so we might close the contour by taking the semi-circle, from R to -R in the upper half plane. There will be a problem at x= 0 where the is a (removable) singularity. You might, then, change the line from -R to R by taking a small semi-circle, of radius "r", say, from -r to r, also in the upper half plane.

The question is of course why take this small semi-circle in the upper half plane and not in the lower half plane :-)
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
917
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K