How to Use Epsilon-Delta Definition of Limits to Prove Inequality?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on using the epsilon-delta definition of limits to prove that for functions f and g, where lim_{x → 1} f(x) = α and lim_{x → 1} g(x) = β with α < β, there exists a δ > 0 such that f(x) < g(x) for all x satisfying 1 - δ < x < 1 + δ. Participants emphasize the need to define δ as the minimum of δ₁ and δ₂, which correspond to the closeness of f(x) to α and g(x) to β, respectively. The key takeaway is that by selecting an appropriate ε, one can ensure that f(x) remains less than g(x) within the defined limits.

PREREQUISITES
  • Epsilon-delta definition of limits
  • Understanding of limits in real analysis
  • Basic knowledge of functions and inequalities
  • Familiarity with mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in detail
  • Practice proving inequalities using limits
  • Explore examples of limits involving piecewise functions
  • Learn about continuity and its relationship with limits
USEFUL FOR

Students in calculus or real analysis, mathematics educators, and anyone looking to strengthen their understanding of limits and inequalities in mathematical proofs.

zeebo17
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let [tex]f: \Re \rightarrow \Re[/tex] and [tex]g: \Re \rightarrow \Re[/tex] be functions such that
[tex]lim_{x \rightarrow 1} f(x)=\alpha[/tex]
and
[tex]lim_{x \rightarrow 1} g(x)=\beta[/tex]
for some [tex]\alpha, \beta \in \Re[/tex] with [tex]\alpha < \beta[/tex]. Use the [tex]\epsilon-\delta[/tex] definition of a limit to prove there exists a number [tex]\delta >0[/tex]
such that [tex]f(x)<g(x)[/tex] for all [tex]x[/tex] satisfying [tex]1- \delta < x< 1+ \delta[/tex].


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



By definition I know that there exists a
[tex]\delta_1 >0[/tex] s.t. [tex]\left|f(x)-\alpha \right|< \epsilon_1[/tex] [tex]\forall \left| x-\alpha \right| < \delta_1[/tex]
and
[tex]\delta_2 >0[/tex] s.t. [tex]\left|g(x)-\beta \right|< \epsilon_2[/tex] [tex]\forall \left| x-\beta \right| < \delta_2[/tex].

Then I know that the [tex]1- \delta < x< 1+ \delta[/tex] can simplify to [tex]\left| x-1 \right| < \delta[/tex].

Perhaps I should set [tex]\delta = min( \delta_1, \delta_2)[/tex]? It seems that I need to show that if I can get [tex]x[/tex] close enough to 1 ([tex]\left| x-1 \right| < \delta[/tex]) then [tex]f(x)[/tex] can get close enough to [tex]\alpha[/tex] and [tex]g(x)[/tex] can get close enough to [tex]\beta[/tex], thus because [tex]\alpha < \beta[/tex] we have [tex]f(x) < g(x)[/tex]. Am I on the right track? If so how would I start to prove this?


Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You will need to find [itex]\delta[/itex], but remember that [itex]\delta[/itex] depends on [itex]\epsilon[/itex]. You're on the right track; what do you think you need to pick for epsilon so that f(x) is "close enough" to [itex]\alpha[/itex] and g(x) is "close enough" to [itex]\beta[/itex]?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K