zeebo17
- 40
- 0
Homework Statement
Let [tex]f: \Re \rightarrow \Re[/tex] and [tex]g: \Re \rightarrow \Re[/tex] be functions such that
[tex]lim_{x \rightarrow 1} f(x)=\alpha[/tex]
and
[tex]lim_{x \rightarrow 1} g(x)=\beta[/tex]
for some [tex]\alpha, \beta \in \Re[/tex] with [tex]\alpha < \beta[/tex]. Use the [tex]\epsilon-\delta[/tex] definition of a limit to prove there exists a number [tex]\delta >0[/tex]
such that [tex]f(x)<g(x)[/tex] for all [tex]x[/tex] satisfying [tex]1- \delta < x< 1+ \delta[/tex].
Homework Equations
The Attempt at a Solution
By definition I know that there exists a
[tex]\delta_1 >0[/tex] s.t. [tex]\left|f(x)-\alpha \right|< \epsilon_1[/tex] [tex]\forall \left| x-\alpha \right| < \delta_1[/tex]
and
[tex]\delta_2 >0[/tex] s.t. [tex]\left|g(x)-\beta \right|< \epsilon_2[/tex] [tex]\forall \left| x-\beta \right| < \delta_2[/tex].
Then I know that the [tex]1- \delta < x< 1+ \delta[/tex] can simplify to [tex]\left| x-1 \right| < \delta[/tex].
Perhaps I should set [tex]\delta = min( \delta_1, \delta_2)[/tex]? It seems that I need to show that if I can get [tex]x[/tex] close enough to 1 ([tex]\left| x-1 \right| < \delta[/tex]) then [tex]f(x)[/tex] can get close enough to [tex]\alpha[/tex] and [tex]g(x)[/tex] can get close enough to [tex]\beta[/tex], thus because [tex]\alpha < \beta[/tex] we have [tex]f(x) < g(x)[/tex]. Am I on the right track? If so how would I start to prove this?
Thanks!
Last edited: