How to Use Pascal's Identity to Simplify a Combinatorial Proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter pazo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the inequality involving binomial coefficients using Pascal's Identity. The original problem states that for positive integers n, n1, n2, ..., nk, where the sum of n_i equals n, the inequality holds true. Participants suggest rewriting the left-hand side explicitly and exploring specific cases, such as when k equals n. One contributor identifies a mistake in the inequality direction and clarifies that when k equals n, the inequality simplifies to a true statement. The conversation emphasizes the need to incorporate the conditions on k and the sum of n_i to solidify the proof.
pazo
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I cannot seem to understand how to do a combinatorial proof on this one.

1. The problem statement: all variables and given/known data
Prove that for all positive numbers n, n1,n2,nk, where 2 \leq k \leq n, and \sum_{i=1}^k n_i = n the following is true
<br /> \newcommand{\colv}[2] {\left(\begin{array}{c} #1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right)}<br /> \colv{n+1}{2} &lt; \colv{n_1+1}{2} + \colv{n_2+1}{2} + ...+ \colv{n_k+1}{2}<br />

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I applied pascals identity to remove "+ 1", and now I have the formula:
<br /> \newcommand{\colv}[2] {\left(\begin{array}{c} #1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right)}<br /> \colv{n}{2} &lt; \colv{n_1}{2} + \colv{n_2}{2} + ... + \colv{n_k}{2}<br />

But I must admit that this still doesn't seem to help my understanding of how to attack this problem.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
have you tried writing out the LHS explicitly as
\newcommand{\colv}[2] {\left(\begin{array}{c} #1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right)} \colv{n_k}{2} = \frac{n_k(n_k -1)}{2}

I haven't followed it though, but could be good place to start. Trying the 2 var case say n = p+q could also lead to some useful insights
 
I made an error. Sorry!
<br /> \newcommand{\colv}[2] {\left(\begin{array}{c} #1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right)}<br /> \colv{n+1}{2} &gt; \colv{n_1+1}{2} + \colv{n_2+1}{2} + ...+ \colv{n_k+1}{2}<br />
is the right one(I changed < with >).
 
ok so have you tried the other stuff yet?
 
lanedance:

I tried, but didn't get any further. I need, somehow, to get the part in where 2 \leq k \leq n. But then again if k = n it won't be true. So I also need the part where

<br /> \sum_{i=1}^k n_i = n <br />

Do you have any advice on how to do that? Or am I completely wrong? :)
 
well if k = n then, ni = 1, and the inequality becomes

\newcommand{\colv}[2] {\left(\begin{array}{c} #1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right)}\colv{n+1}{2} &gt; \colv{2}{2} + \colv{2}{2} + ...+ \colv{2}{2} = 1+1+..+1 = n

\newcommand{\colv}[2] {\left(\begin{array}{c} #1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right)}\colv{n+1}{2} = \frac{(n+1)!}{(n-1)!(2)!} = \frac{(n+1)n}{2} &gt; n

so the inequality is true as n >= 2
 
now see what you can do with post #2
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K