How to use the triangle inequality to solve a proof involving absolute values?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around using the triangle inequality to prove a statement involving absolute values, specifically that \(\left| s_n - s \right| < 1\) implies \(\left| s_n \right| < \left| s \right| + 1\). The subject area is primarily focused on inequalities and properties of absolute values in mathematical proofs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the triangle inequality and attempt to manipulate inequalities involving absolute values. Some question how to apply the triangle inequality effectively, while others suggest considering specific cases or alternative formulations of the inequality.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing hints and exploring different angles of the problem. Some have suggested specific manipulations of the triangle inequality, while others are questioning the validity of their approaches or seeking more elegant proofs. There is a collaborative atmosphere with hints being exchanged, but no consensus has been reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of correctly applying the triangle inequality and express uncertainty about their previous attempts. There is also mention of potential flaws in reasoning and the need for clarity in the application of mathematical principles.

Bennigan88
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use the triangle inequality to prove that \left| s_n - s \right| &lt; 1 \implies \left| s_n \right| &lt; \left| s \right| +1

Homework Equations


The triangle inequality states that \left| a-b \right| \leq \left| a-c \right| + \left| c-b \right|


The Attempt at a Solution


So far I have \left| s_n - s \right| &lt; 1 \implies -1 &lt; s_n - s &lt; 1 \implies s_n &lt; s + 1. But now I don't see how I can use the triangle inequality to move forward. Hints greatly appreciated, no spoilers please!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bennigan88 said:

Homework Statement


Use the triangle inequality to prove that \left| s_n - s \right| &lt; 1 \implies \left| s_n \right| &lt; \left| s \right| +1

Homework Equations


The triangle inequality states that \left| a-b \right| \leq \left| a-c \right| + \left| c-b \right|

The Attempt at a Solution


So far I have \left| s_n - s \right| &lt; 1 \implies -1 &lt; s_n - s &lt; 1 \implies s_n &lt; s + 1. But now I don't see how I can use the triangle inequality to move forward. Hints greatly appreciated, no spoilers please!
Well, if ##s_n## is less than ##s+1##, what does that imply about ##|s_n|##?

Edit: The utter wrongness of my previous post should be disregarded while I sit in the corner of shame. One can also consider the case where c = 0 in the given statement of the triangle inequality too get your answer.
 
Last edited:
Bennigan88 said:

Homework Statement


Use the triangle inequality to prove that \left| s_n - s \right| &lt; 1 \implies \left| s_n \right| &lt; \left| s \right| +1

Homework Equations


The triangle inequality states that \left| a-b \right| \leq \left| a-c \right| + \left| c-b \right|


The Attempt at a Solution


So far I have \left| s_n - s \right| &lt; 1 \implies -1 &lt; s_n - s &lt; 1 \implies s_n &lt; s + 1. But now I don't see how I can use the triangle inequality to move forward. Hints greatly appreciated, no spoilers please!

Do you have the equivalent inequality ##|a+b|\le |a|+|b|## to work with? That is what is usually called the triangle inequality. Anyway, here's my hint: ##|a| = |(a-b)+b|##.
 
I found that in general, a &lt; b + 1 \nRightarrow \left| a \right| &lt; \left| b \right| + 1. Setting c = 0 would give me \left|{s_n-s}\right| &lt; \left|{s_n}\right| + \left|{s}\right|. I feel like what I really need to show is \left|{s}\right| - \left|{s_n}\right| \leq \left|{s_n-s}\right|.
 
Write down the triangle inequality. You need a minus sign, which can be obtained by moving something to the other side of the inequality.
 
As far as I can figure, the way to prove it is this: ## \left|{a+b}\right| \leq \left|{a}\right| + \left|{b}\right| \implies \left|{a}\right| \geq \left|{a+b}\right| - \left|{b}\right| \implies \left|{\left({a+b}\right)-b}\right| \geq \left|{a+b}\right| - \left|{b}\right|
\implies \left|{x-y}\right| \geq \left|{x}\right| - \left|{y}\right| ## as long as ##y = b## and ##x = b + a## but since for any ##b## any other number can be expressed as ##b+a## for some ##a##, this holds for all ##x,y##.

Is there a flaw? Is there a more elegant way to show this?
 
LCKurtz said:
Do you have the equivalent inequality ##|a+b|\le |a|+|b|## to work with? That is what is usually called the triangle inequality. Anyway, here's my hint: ##|a| = |(a-b)+b|##.

Bennigan88 said:
As far as I can figure, the way to prove it is this: ## \left|{a+b}\right| \leq \left|{a}\right| + \left|{b}\right| \implies \left|{a}\right| \geq \left|{a+b}\right| - \left|{b}\right| \implies \left|{\left({a+b}\right)-b}\right| \geq \left|{a+b}\right| - \left|{b}\right|
\implies \left|{x-y}\right| \geq \left|{x}\right| - \left|{y}\right| ## as long as ##y = b## and ##x = b + a## but since for any ##b## any other number can be expressed as ##b+a## for some ##a##, this holds for all ##x,y##.

Is there a flaw? Is there a more elegant way to show this?

Using my hint:##|a| = |(a-b)+b|\le |a-b| + |b|\implies |a|-|b|\le |a-b|##. That's it. You can get absolute values on the left if you switch the ##a## and ##b## so you have ##|b|-|a|\le |a-b|##. Together those give ##|\,|a|-|b|\,|\le |a-b|##. That is usually called the reverse triangle inequality.
 
LCKurtz said:
Using my hint:##|a| = |(a-b)+b|\le |a-b| + |b|\implies |a|-|b|\le |a-b|##. That's it. You can get absolute values on the left if you switch the ##a## and ##b## so you have ##|b|-|a|\le |a-b|##. Together those give ##|\,|a|-|b|\,|\le |a-b|##. That is usually called the reverse triangle inequality.

Thank you, that's much nicer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
896
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K