How to use Weibull distribution when it comes to wind?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kolika28
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Distribution Wind
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the application of the Weibull distribution in wind speed analysis, specifically questioning the use of a midpoint value of 5 m/s. There is confusion regarding whether to integrate the probability density function (pdf) using limits of 4.5 and 5.5 or to simply use the cumulative distribution function (CDF). It is clarified that using the midpoint is acceptable if the distribution is approximately linear in that range. The importance of understanding how to calculate probabilities for specific wind speeds and intervals using the Weibull distribution is emphasized. Overall, the conversation seeks clarity on the correct methodology for applying the Weibull distribution in wind speed assessments.
Kolika28
Messages
146
Reaction score
28
Homework Statement
I'm asked to find out how many hours of the year that the wind is between 4,5 m/s and 5,5 m/s.
Relevant Equations
Weibull formula
I know that I'm supposed to use Weibull, but why does my teacher take the middle value, 5 m/s? Should one not integrate the formula and the use 4,5 and 5,5 as limits? This is what he has done:
1575392548860.png

He then writes: makes a guess of an interval of 1 m/s and get:
1575392837248.png

1575392925153.png


To be honest, I really don't understand how to use Weibull distribution, and it would be great if someone could explain. I tried finding some websites, but I don't understand. How do I find the probability for one specific wind speed, or find the probability for an interval like this problem I posted?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you so much!
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
667
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K