How to Visualize a 4 vector (e.g. a velocity)?

Click For Summary
Velocity is a 4-vector comprising three spatial dimensions and one time dimension, with its spatial components directed along the three spatial axes. The concept of "inverse" direction in relation to the time component raises questions about visualization. To visualize a 4-vector, Minkowski diagrams can be utilized, particularly in (1+1)d, where they represent the normalized tangent to a particle's worldline. While (2+1)d Minkowski diagrams are possible, they are more complex and less intuitive. There is currently no effective method to represent (3+1)d diagrams visually.
Ashshahril
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
How to Visualize a 4 vector(e.g. velocity)?
Relevant Equations
Velocity = distance/time
Velocity is a 4-vector which has 3 space dimensions and 1 time dimension. It's space parts will be directed at the 3 space directions and time parts will be directed at the time dimension (But it is inverse. So, will it point at the inverse direction?). How can someone Visualize it? How they arrange themselves in a 4d grid line?

Can you show all the 4-vectors at once?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ashshahril said:
Velocity is a 4-vector which has 3 space dimensions and 1 time dimension. It's space parts will be directed at the 3 space directions and time parts will be directed at the time dimension
A vector is just a magnitude and a direction. Don't think of it in terms of components - just think of it as an arrow at a point, pointing in some direction.
Ashshahril said:
But it is inverse.
I don't know what you mean by "inverse".
Ashshahril said:
How can someone Visualize it?
In (1+1)d, draw a Minkowski diagram. This is a Euclidean representation of a Minkowski plane, but that's as good as it gets. The four velocity is the Minkowski normalised tangent to the particle's worldline.

In (2+1)d you can also draw Minkowski diagrams but they're harder to understand.

I don't know any way to draw (3+1)d diagrams.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
771
Replies
40
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K