How to write powers of inverse trigonometric functions?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the notation and interpretation of powers of inverse trigonometric functions, specifically the confusion surrounding the notation ##\sin^{-1}## and its implications in mathematical expressions. Participants explore the distinctions between functional and multiplicative inverses in the context of trigonometric functions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether ##(\sin^{-1}\theta)^2 = \sin^{-2}\theta##, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the notation.
  • Another participant suggests using ##\arcsin## for the functional inverse of ##\sin## and ##\csc## for its multiplicative inverse to avoid confusion, proposing that ##\sin^{-n}=\csc^n## for positive integers.
  • A different participant expresses skepticism about the need for such notation, advocating for the use of the inverse function directly.
  • One participant notes that the notation "sin^{-1}(x)" for the inverse function is unfortunate, highlighting the potential for misunderstanding.
  • Another participant acknowledges their previous use of ##\sin^{-1}\theta## instead of ##\arcsin\theta##, recognizing the distinction between them and suggesting that ##\sin^{-1}\theta=\csc\theta##.
  • Links to external resources are provided, indicating that some sources use ##\sin^{-1}\theta=\arcsin\theta##, which adds to the confusion surrounding the notation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate notation for inverse trigonometric functions, with no consensus reached on the best approach to avoid confusion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the limitations of notation in conveying mathematical concepts, particularly the ambiguity in the use of ##\sin^{-1}## and its interpretation as either a functional or multiplicative inverse.

Kuhan
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Does ##(\sin^{-1}\theta)^2 =\sin^{-2}\theta## ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think we use ##\arcsin## for the functional inverse of ##\sin## and ##\csc## for its multiplicative inverse, instead of ##\sin^{-1}##, in order to avoid this confusion. As ##\sin^n## is multiplicative for ##n>0##, I would say that ##\sin^{-n}=\csc^n##. If one needed to write many times the functional iterates and inverses of ##\sin##, I would recommend to use a notation like ##\sin^{[n]}## or ##\sin^{\circ n}##, which I've found in papers dealing with iterated functions.
 
why would you even come across something like that?

would be easier to just use the inverse function mate.
 
To put it simply, "[itex]sin^{-1}(x)[/itex]" for the inverse function is an unfortunate notation!
 
Alberto7 said:
I think we use ##\arcsin## for the functional inverse of ##\sin## and ##\csc## for its multiplicative inverse, instead of ##\sin^{-1}##, in order to avoid this confusion. As ##\sin^n## is multiplicative for ##n>0##, I would say that ##\sin^{-n}=\csc^n##. If one needed to write many times the functional iterates and inverses of ##\sin##, I would recommend to use a notation like ##\sin^{[n]}## or ##\sin^{\circ n}##, which I've found in papers dealing with iterated functions.

Thanks! now it makes sense. I used to use ##\sin^{-1}\theta## instead of ##\arcsin\theta## . They just aren't the same, I guess. Basically,
##\sin^{-1}\theta=\csc\theta##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K