How water, CO2, sand etc extinguish fire?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Raghav Gupta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Co2 Fire Water
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanisms by which various substances, including water, CO2, and other gases, extinguish fire. Participants explore theoretical and practical aspects of fire suppression, including the effectiveness of different extinguishing agents and the role of environmental factors like wind.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that water extinguishes fire by cooling and by keeping oxygen away, while CO2 is noted for blocking oxygen access.
  • One participant recounts an incident where a specific fire extinguisher was unavailable, leading to a race car fire fueled by magnesium components.
  • Questions arise about the effectiveness of wind in extinguishing fire, with some arguing that increased oxygen from wind should promote burning rather than extinguishing it.
  • A participant with fire control experience mentions that nitrogen and oxygen currents can cool fires, referencing the fire triangle of fuel, oxidant, and heat.
  • Concerns are raised about the cooling effect of wind, with one participant challenging the idea that wind can cool a fire effectively.
  • Discussion includes the potential use of soft drinks as extinguishing agents, noting that while they contain CO2, the water content is the primary extinguishing factor.
  • Participants discuss the limitations of using water on grease fires, highlighting the dangers of dispersing burning grease.
  • One participant mentions that nitrogen can suffocate fires and that wind can extinguish flames by cooling them, akin to blowing out a candle.
  • Another participant warns that wind can exacerbate wildfires by introducing more oxygen and changing fire direction.
  • Historical context is provided regarding the use of Halon 1301 as a fire suppressant, which has since been banned due to environmental concerns.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the effectiveness of various fire extinguishing methods and the role of wind in fire dynamics. There is no consensus on the best alternative extinguishing agents or the impact of wind on fire behavior.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve unclear terminology, such as "higher molecular gases," and the specific conditions under which different extinguishing agents are effective remain unresolved.

Raghav Gupta
Messages
1,010
Reaction score
76
Well all answer this basic question by saying that water decreases the heat energy of fire, CO2 blocks O2 from reaching fire.But what about coke, higher molecular gases.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
There are fuels which combustion will not be prevented by particular extinguishers.

I once had to watch a beautiful little race car burn completely to ashes for the proper fire extinguisher being too far away to arrive in time. The car spun out, rolled the tire off the magnesium wheel which ignited and spread to the magnesium engine block and transmission.
 
Then what is the reason for fire being extinguished when wind blows. There is more amount of oxygen in air then CO2. So it should burn?
 
Fire extinguished by a current of N2 and O2 is due to cooling. Remember combustion as a triangle of necessity, fuel, oxidant, and heat.

I was a state certified fire control technician in California (Sixties) and Georgia (Eighties). I certified in Georgia specifically to provide automobile race track-side assistance.
 
That doesn't seem so sound.When wind blows how it cools? It may be hot air. Then by your logic still air must also extinguish fire?
 
Raghav Gupta said:
Well all answer this basic question by saying that water decreases the heat energy of fire, CO2 blocks O2 from reaching fire.But what about coke, higher molecular gases.

Well, what about coke? This is a substance with a high percentage of elemental carbon, i.e., it's a fuel. No one tries to extinguish a fire by adding more fuel to it.

Which 'higher molecular gases' are you talking about? (This term is unclear)

Water extinguishes many types of fires because it 1) keeps oxygen away, and 2) it cools the burning material by absorbing heat.

However, water should not be used to extinguish a grease fire, for example, because it will disperse the burning grease, possibly creating additional fires, and because grease floats on water, which allows the fire continued access to oxygen.
 
SteamKing said:
Well, what about coke? This is a substance with a high percentage of elemental carbon, i.e., it's a fuel. No one tries to extinguish a fire by adding more fuel to it.

Which 'higher molecular gases' are you talking about? (This term is unclear)

Water extinguishes many types of fires because it 1) keeps oxygen away, and 2) it cools the burning material by absorbing heat.

However, water should not be used to extinguish a grease fire, for example, because it will disperse the burning grease, possibly creating additional fires, and because grease floats on water, which allows the fire continued access to oxygen.
Sorry . I am talking of coke(drinkable) like Pepsi or diet coke. Gases like SO2 or there are many gases except organic ones.
 
SteamKing said:
[ ... ]However, water should not be used to extinguish a grease fire, for example, because it will disperse the burning grease, possibly creating additional fires, and because grease floats on water, which allows the fire continued access to oxygen.
The result of adding water to a grease fire is a spectacular and common demonstration at firefighting schools.

A half-full drum of oil is ignited and self-heated to a rolling boil. Then a liter of water at the end of a long manipulator is plunged into the boiling oil, flashes to steam and launches a large fire ball.

A lesson shortly following has the training structure (concrete, multi-level, grated decks, drains, emergency flooding capability) flooded with fuel and the trainee hose team is directed to wait until the fuel is well ignited and enter. The hose is spun to splash the fuel and flames away and everyone huddles around the nozzle for the fresh cool air entrained in the water stream. I'm still impressed fifty years later. I first served on an ammunition ship, USS Paricutin AE-18 (so old that my mother remembered grinding on it).
 
Raghav Gupta said:
Sorry . I am talking of coke(drinkable) like Pepsi or diet coke. Gases like SO2 or there are many gases except organic ones.
Unlike CO2, sulfur dioxide is capable of further combustion to form SO3. Sulfur oxides are also capable of forming choking fumes which can incapacitate anyone unfortunate enough to breathe these gases, even in concentrations not sufficient to asphyxiate. SO3, when it comes into contact with water or moisture, turns into sulfuric acid.

Soft drinks can be used to extinguish a fire in a pinch, but this is a very expensive way. Although carbonated beverages contain small amounts of dissolved CO2, when this gas comes out of solution, there is generally not enough of it to provide a sufficient displacement of oxygen to starve the fire. The water from the beverage would be the extinguishing agent.
 
  • #10
SteamKing said:
Unlike CO2, sulfur dioxide is capable of further combustion to form SO3. Sulfur oxides are also capable of forming choking fumes which can incapacitate anyone unfortunate enough to breathe these gases, even in concentrations not sufficient to asphyxiate. SO3, when it comes into contact with water or moisture, turns into sulfuric acid.

Soft drinks can be used to extinguish a fire in a pinch, but this is a very expensive way. Although carbonated beverages contain small amounts of dissolved CO2, when this gas comes out of solution, there is generally not enough of it to provide a sufficient displacement of oxygen to starve the fire. The water from the beverage would be the extinguishing agent.
So is there any liquid other than water, a economical one which can extinguish fire and any gas for the same other than CO2? How does wind extinguish small range fire? The number 4 post of Doug Huffman did not seem so sound.
 
  • #11
Raghav Gupta said:
other than water, a economical one which can extinguish fire
Not a whole lot of things come to mind.
Raghav Gupta said:
any gas for the same other than CO2?
Nitrogen will suffocate and cool most fires. Do the job in a pinch.
Raghav Gupta said:
How does wind extinguish small range fire?
The same way you blow out candles or matches, by cooling the flame before it can transfer heat to the fuel. That's if "range" means stove/cooking appliance. If "range" means prairie/steppe/grassland, the heat is transferred down wind to other fuel, and you've got problems.
 
  • #12
Bystander said:
The same way you blow out candles or matches, by cooling the flame before it can transfer heat to the fuel. That's if "range" means stove/cooking appliance. If "range" means prairie/steppe/grassland, the heat is transferred down wind to other fuel, and you've got problems.
But the wind could be hot. I know it would be relatively less hot than flame but then still air which sometimes might be cooler than wind must also extinguish fire?
 
  • #13
Wind is actually an enemy to controlling wild fires big and small. In addition to bringing more oxygen to the flames, changes in wind direction can cause a fire to change direction suddenly, potentially trapping firefighters or others in places which put them at risk from being injured or killed by the fire.

At one time, a gas called Halon 1301 was used instead of CO2 to smother fires in enclosed spaces, like the engine rooms of ships. Because it was in a class of chemical compounds similar to CFCs, its use was banned by the Montreal Protocol because it damaged the ozone layer of the atmosphere.

http://www.facilitiesnet.com/firesa...-Fire-Suppression-Systems-Were-Banned--10300#

There are several other fire suppression systems which use a variety of different gases:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaseous_fire_suppression
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
7K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K