How will the equation for gravitational force be changed?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the gravitational force equation and how it may change when considering the distance between two masses, particularly in the context of a rod and a particle. Participants explore the implications of distance on the gravitational force formula.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the behavior of the gravitational force equation as the distance increases, questioning the role of the length of the rod in this context. There is exploration of limits and ratios, particularly the relationship between L and d as d becomes much larger than L.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes attempts to mathematically demonstrate how the gravitational force approaches a specific form as distance increases. Some participants express uncertainty and seek clarification on the mathematical reasoning involved, while others provide guidance on using limits to support their arguments.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the application of limits and the mathematical proof required to show the relationship between L and d in the gravitational force equation. Participants are navigating through assumptions about the behavior of these variables in the context of the problem.

Edel Crine
Messages
89
Reaction score
12
Homework Statement
There is a gravitational force between a particle and a uniform rod.
m is a mass of particle, M is a mass and L is a length of the rod. d is the distance between the head of the rod and particle.
If the d>>L, how does the equation for the gravitational force of the rod to a particle will be changed?
Relevant Equations
F = GmM/d(d+L)
At first, I thought when the rod goes really far away from the particle, then L would approach to zero in a particle's reference view. As a result, the equation will be GmM/d^2. However, I just thought that L just remain as it is regardless of change in d, but not sure...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct but for the wrong reason. What you are saying might have some intuitive sense but it is mathematically incorrect or inaccurate. What really happens is that when d becomes very large in comparison to L then the ratio ##\frac{L}{d}## tends to zero.

How can you take advantage that for ##d>>L## it will be ##\frac{L}{d}\approx 0## to prove mathematically that the force will tend to ##F\approx G\frac{mM}{d^2}##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Edel Crine
Delta2 said:
You are correct but for the wrong reason. What you are saying might have some intuitive sense but it is mathematically incorrect or inaccurate. What really happens is that when d becomes very large in comparison to L then the ratio ##\frac{L}{d}## tends to zero.

How can you take advantage that for ##d>>L## it will be ##\frac{L}{d}\approx 0## to prove mathematically that the force will tend to ##F\approx G\frac{mM}{d^2}##?
Ummmm... using limit...?
lim d->∞ (L/d) = L/∞ = 0...?
 
You are just using limits to prove that $$lim_{d \to +\infty}\frac{L}{d}=0$$ which is fine but I didn't ask you to do this. Essentially I asked you to prove that $$\lim_{\frac{L}{d} \to 0}G\frac{mM}{d(d+L)}=G\frac{mM}{d^2}$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Edel Crine
Delta2 said:
You are just using limits to prove that $$lim_{d \to +\infty}\frac{L}{d}=0$$ which is fine but I didn't ask you to do this. Essentially I asked you to prove that $$\lim_{\frac{L}{d} \to 0}G\frac{mM}{d(d+L)}=G\frac{mM}{d^2}$$
I'm so sorry... little stuck...
 
Delta2 said:
You are just using limits to prove that $$lim_{d \to +\infty}\frac{L}{d}=0$$ which is fine but I didn't ask you to do this. Essentially I asked you to prove that $$\lim_{\frac{L}{d} \to 0}G\frac{mM}{d(d+L)}=G\frac{mM}{d^2}$$
Oh, if I divide both numerator and denominator by d^2, then
(GmM/d^2)*(1/(1+L/d))
=GmM/d^2)*(1/(1+0))
=(GmM/d^2)*1
=GmM/d^2
?
 
Well now you have essentially proven it correctly :D.

You just have to learn to use ##LATEX## though :D
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Edel Crine
Delta2 said:
Well now you have essentially proven it correctly :D.

You just have to learn to use ##LATEX## though :D
I really appreciate! That makes a lot more sense to me! Yes, learning LATEX would be much easier to show my works... Anyway, you have a great day!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
4K