B How would a radial component of induced electric field makes flux ≠ 0

AI Thread Summary
A radial component of the induced electric field indicates that the net electric flux is not zero, which can be understood through the symmetry of the system. When considering a cylindrical Gaussian surface with its axis aligned with the magnetic field, the electric field points uniformly outward across the surface. This uniformity ensures that the integral of the electric field over the surface results in a non-zero value. The discussion clarifies the visualization of the Gaussian surface and the implications of the electric field's direction. Understanding these concepts resolves the initial confusion regarding the relationship between the electric field and electric flux.
KnightTheConqueror
Messages
16
Reaction score
8
I don't understand this paragraph of Resnick halliday Krane where it says that if a radial component of induced electric field exists, it would mean net electric flux is not zero. I guess I am not exactly able to visualise the gaussian surface and how the flux is not zero. Please help
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240605_200039_Moon+ Reader Pro.jpg
    Screenshot_20240605_200039_Moon+ Reader Pro.jpg
    37.9 KB · Views: 67
Physics news on Phys.org
You appear to have a uniform magnetic field pointing out of the page. The Gaussian surface being considered is any arbitrary cylindrical surface with its axis pointing out of the page. The symmetry of the situation under rotation about the axis of our arbitrary cylinder means that if the electric field points outwards at any point on the surface it points outwards everywhere on the surface, so ##\vec E\cdot d\vec S## has the same value everywhere and hence the integral is necessarily non-zero.

Other symmetry arguments are available under these circumstances, but that seems to be the one they picked, if I understand right.
 
  • Like
Likes KnightTheConqueror
Thank you. After reading your answer I read the paragraph in the book again and now everything is clear
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top