How would I find what a recursive sequence converges to a certain point?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Quantumpencil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point Sequence
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a recursively defined sequence {a(n)} where a(1)=1 and a(n+1)=√(1+a(n)). The original poster seeks to prove convergence and determine the limit without using a calculator.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of substituting n with n+1 in the recursive definition and question the complexity of evaluating the limit. There is a suggestion to assume convergence and set the limit as l, leading to the equation l=√(1+l). Some participants express confusion about how to derive the limit from the recursive relationship.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights into the recursive nature of the sequence and its convergence properties. There is an ongoing exploration of the limit's value, with some participants identifying potential solutions and discussing the validity of those solutions based on the sequence's behavior.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the sequence is increasing and that the limit cannot be negative, which influences the discussion on the possible values of the limit derived from the quadratic equation.

Quantumpencil
Messages
96
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given the sequence {a(n)}, which is refined recursively by

a(1)=1, a(n+1)=√(1+a(n))

Prove that the sequence converges and find it's limit.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I proved that it converges with two pretty easy induction cases.

I've also found what it converges to, the golden ratio w/ a calculator. How would I go about this not using a calculator? Usually one would just consider the infinite case but here I'm not sure how to do that.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Quantumpencil! :smile:

(have a square-root: √ :wink:)
Quantumpencil said:
a(1)=1, a(n+1)=sqrt(1+a(n))…
How would I go about this not using a calculator?

Just put n = n+1: a(n)=√(1+a(n)). :wink:
 
Right, I got that; but don't you then end up with an infinite mess that's hard to evaluate?

a(n)=[tex]\sqrt{1+(a(n)}[/tex]; still forces you to substitute in a lot of a(n)'s; Is there no way to just take the limit and get phi?
 
Quantumpencil said:
Right, I got that; but don't you then end up with an infinite mess that's hard to evaluate?

a(n)=[tex]\sqrt{1+(a(n)}[/tex]; still forces you to substitute in a lot of a(n)'s; Is there no way to just take the limit and get phi?

uhh? :confused: a(n) is fixed

if you prefer, just use a …

a = √(1 + a). :smile:
(and what happened to that √ that i gave you? :wink:)​
 
What I'm saying is since each of the subsequent terms depends on the one before it... that sort of seems like magic to me. when you go to infinity there negligible difference between the n+1th and nth term in the sequence, but still...

Even with a(n)=[tex]\sqrt{1+a(n)}[/tex], what would I take a(n) to obtain the Golden ratio?

Sorry if I'm not making sense; I'm confused as to how making this equivalence helps us find the limit; we still don't have an (n) to take the limit with respect to...

Oh, and I noticed the sigma and clicked on it. Pretty cool stuff ;p
 
Assume that the series converges.
Let [tex]lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}a(n)=l[/tex].
[tex]l = \sqrt{1+l}[/tex]
[tex]l^{2}-l-1=0[/tex]
[tex]l=(1+\sqrt{5})/2[/tex] or [tex](1-\sqrt{5})/2[/tex]
 
I have to disagree with tiny-tim here, at least with the way he said it. Saying "put n= n+1" is exactly the same as saying 0= 1! What he meant, I'm sure, is that the sequence {a(n)} necessarily has the same limit as the sequence {a(n+1)}, the same sequence, "shifted" by 1. That leads to what evail is saying:
[tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} a(n)= \sqrt{1+ \lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} a(n+1)}[/tex]
so if the limit is "[itex]l[/itex]", [itex]l= \sqrt{1+ l}[/itex] which has the solutions evail shows.

Of course, the limit is one of [itex](1+ \sqrt{5})/2[/itex] or [itex](1- \sqrt{5})/2[/itex]. Do you see how to determine which one? a(1)= 1>0 and it is easy to see that this sequence is increasing. The limit can't be negative!
 
HallsofIvy said:
I have to disagree with tiny-tim here, at least with the way he said it. Saying "put n= n+1" is exactly the same as saying 0= 1! What he meant, I'm sure, is that the sequence {a(n)} necessarily has the same limit as the sequence {a(n+1)}, the same sequence, "shifted" by 1. That leads to what evail is saying:
[tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} a(n)= \sqrt{1+ \lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} a(n+1)}[/tex]
so if the limit is "[itex]l[/itex]", [itex]l= \sqrt{1+ l}[/itex] which has the solutions evail shows.

Of course, the limit is one of [itex](1+ \sqrt{5})/2[/itex] or [itex](1- \sqrt{5})/2[/itex]. Do you see how to determine which one? a(1)= 1>0 and it is easy to see that this sequence is increasing. The limit can't be negative!

Thanks HallsofIvy for completing my solution! i forgot that a(n+1)>a(n) for all n>1. hahaha.. so i had to reject the negative part :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K