Humans emit very small quantities of light

  • Thread starter Thread starter octelcogopod
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light quantities
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Humans emit very small quantities of light, approximately 1,000 times less intense than the threshold detectable by the naked eye. Dark-adapted eyes can detect individual photons, but a neurochemical signal is only sent to the brain after several photons are detected within about 100 milliseconds. The emitted light is attributed to black body radiation and fluorescence from chemical traces on the skin, although the amounts are minuscule. Factors such as light pollution significantly hinder the visibility of these photons in urban environments.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of black body radiation principles
  • Knowledge of photon detection mechanisms in human vision
  • Familiarity with neurochemical signaling in the retina
  • Awareness of light pollution effects on visibility
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of black body radiation and its relevance to human emission of light
  • Explore the mechanisms of photon detection in the human eye
  • Investigate the impact of light pollution on astronomical observations
  • Learn about fluorescence and its occurrence on human skin
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, biologists, and anyone interested in the intersection of human biology and photonics, as well as those studying the effects of environmental light on visibility.

octelcogopod
Messages
560
Reaction score
0
http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20090722/sc_livescience/strangehumansglowinvisiblelight

Weeird!
But awesome.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org
"1,000 times less intense than the levels to which our naked eyes are sensitive"
Dark adapted eyes can detect individual photons (you don't have to be naked)
 
But if you're naked, your eyes are more likely to be dilated and you'll be better able to detect individual photons.
 
I believe this topic, more or less, appeared years ago on PF.

As a child I thought the graininess of photons in the dark was actually atoms in the air.

If we can "see" individual photons, is this factor of 1000 probabilistic?
 
Loren Booda said:
If we can "see" individual photons, is this factor of 1000 probabilistic?
I would think so: just because you can "see" individual photons, that doesn't mean you can form an image with them. Our eyes do not store/accumulate photons the way a camera does.
 
Well, I was curious how much visible light is emitted by a human simply due to black body radiation...but it's giving me a weird answer,

http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/481/bodyg.png

I would like to know how significant the difference between the black body radiation and this "other" radiation is
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The short wavelength tail of a 310K black is going to be seriously tiny.
This radiation is supposedly fluorescence from chemical traces on the skin
 
mgb_phys said:
The short wavelength tail of a 310K black is going to be seriously tiny.
This radiation is supposedly fluorescence from chemical traces on the skin

And this stuff is also described as being seriously miniscule. So I don't want to know what the relative difference is.
 
And I suppose I can't see any stars here in New Jersey because they went away?
 
  • #10
Pinu7 said:
And I suppose I can't see any stars here in New Jersey because they went away?
No it's because you can't see one photon/second from a star on top of 100,000 photons/sec from light pollution.
 
  • #11
mgb_phys said:
Dark adapted eyes can detect individual photons (you don't have to be naked)

That's not entirely accurate. Although the light-sensitive cells in the retina are capable of responding to a single photon, a neurochemical signal is not sent to the brain until several photons have been detected within the span of about 100 ms.

Cite.
 
  • #12
Just a small OT question..

Whenever I look around and focus a bit, I notice my vision is grainy and it feels like I see individual photons.. I never knew until today what this was, so those are photons I'm seeing?
If it gets dark there's always millions of small light particles that are barely visible, it never gets completely pitch black anywhere, but i can also see them in pure daylight.
 
  • #13
negitron's source also tells us that about 90 photons need to enter the eye for a flash of light to be detected, so it's impossible to actually see single photons. The graininess seen by octelcogopod is analogous to the noise in digital photos: in dark conditions, the eye boosts its sensitivity to the max, even if that means making frequent false detections.
 
  • #14
it never gets completely pitch black anywhere,
Try being in a mine with your lamp turned off.

I can't see how it could get any darker. :)
 
  • #15
Alfi said:
Try being in a mine with your lamp turned off.

I can't see how it could get any darker. :)

There are still photons, including those of visible light, being emitted from various nuclear decay products, cosmic rays, thermal jitter and neutrino activity. Of course, you need a photomultiplier tube to detect them...
 
  • #16
Pinu7 said:
And I suppose I can't see any stars here in New Jersey because they went away?
It's proof that NASA never went to NJ. The photos were staged in New Mexico which looks a lot like New Jersey if you squinch your eyes up real tight.
 
  • #17
negitron said:
There are still photons, including those of visible light, being emitted from various nuclear decay products, cosmic rays, thermal jitter and neutrino activity.
You can see thermoluminescence quite easily, unroll electrical tape or even tread heavily on some types of sand and you get a surprising amount of light.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
913
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K