Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the design and engineering considerations for building a 1000-pound car intended for city driving, specifically focusing on the hydraulic power system, gearing, and efficiency of the proposed setup. Participants explore various technical aspects, including tire size, hydraulic motor specifications, and potential alternatives to hydraulic systems.
Discussion Character
- Technical explanation
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- Ray Mills outlines his plan to build a lightweight car powered by a 16 HP gas engine driving a hydraulic motor, seeking advice on the appropriate gearing from the hydraulic motor to the axle.
- One participant emphasizes the importance of calculating the effective radius of the tires, noting that tire deformation affects the effective radius and thus the RPM needed to achieve 45 MPH.
- Another participant suggests that the hydraulic system may be inefficient, highlighting a potential 20% loss at each stage and recommending consideration of electric systems for better efficiency.
- Discussion includes calculations for tire circumference and the necessary gear ratio to achieve the desired speed, with some participants providing specific tire size data and calculations.
- Ray Mills mentions his preference for a hydrostatic design over using accumulators, citing potential efficiency improvements based on industry feedback.
- Several participants share historical anecdotes about similar vehicles and innovations, including a micro car from the 1970s and alternative power sources like compressed air and turbine engines.
- Concerns are raised about the feasibility of building such a vehicle independently, with some participants expressing skepticism about the resources required and the influence of larger industries on innovation.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the efficiency of hydraulic systems versus electric systems, with no consensus reached on the best approach for the proposed vehicle. Calculations and technical specifications are debated, but no definitive conclusions are drawn.
Contextual Notes
Participants note various assumptions regarding tire specifications, hydraulic system efficiency, and the potential impact of design choices on overall performance. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity involved in achieving the desired vehicle performance without resolving all technical uncertainties.
Who May Find This Useful
Individuals interested in automotive engineering, hydraulic systems, and alternative vehicle designs may find this discussion relevant, particularly those exploring DIY projects or innovations in small vehicle efficiency.