Hyper-complex fields in Supergravity?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Professor_E
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fields Supergravity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical concept of split-complex numbers, defined as z = x + jy with the property that j^2 = +1. This contrasts with traditional complex numbers, where j^2 = -1. The author reflects on a previously abandoned solution in supergravity that may be mathematically viable if interpreted through the lens of split-complex numbers. They seek references to classical field Lagrangians that incorporate split-complex solutions, particularly in the context of supergravity and special relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of split-complex numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with supergravity theories and solutions
  • Knowledge of classical field theory and Lagrangians
  • Basic concepts of special relativity and its mathematical frameworks
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical foundations of split-complex numbers
  • Explore existing literature on supergravity solutions involving complex structures
  • Investigate classical field Lagrangians that utilize split-complex numbers
  • Examine the application of Perplex numbers in special relativity
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, theoretical physicists, and researchers interested in advanced mathematical frameworks in supergravity and special relativity.

Professor_E
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Dear colleagues
I have recently come across a mathematical reference discussing all possible generalizations of complex numbers. A particularly interesting such generalization is known as split-complex numbers. These are defined:

z = x+jy
z* = x-jy

similarly to ordinary complex numbers except that j^2 = +1 not -1. This makes:

zz* = x^2 - y^2

Having learned about this for the first time, it immediately brought memories of a solution in supergravity that I have found but abandoned on physical grounds some time ago. It seems to me now that the solution I have found would be well-behaved, at least mathematically, if I had assumed it to be split-complex! But this begs the question: What does that mean physically? Do any of you know of any precedent in the literature.
I am just curious, but perhaps I will take a second look at that solution ...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
robphy said:
The "Perplex numbers" can be used in special relativity.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.14605

(I am using them to develop a new way to teach relativity.)

Thanks - Yes I am aware to their application to special relativity. But what I am looking for is a precedent for a classical field Lagrangian that has split-complex solutions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
11K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
16K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K