# Hyperbolic Geometry in special relativity

• StationZero
In summary: What common(?) circular geometrical framework are you specifically referring to?The one you are currently using.
StationZero
Hi, I am new to the study of special relativity but think I understand it pretty well from the common circular geometrical framework. How important is it that I also understand it from the hyperbolic perspective and what would I gain over my current circular understanding?

StationZero said:
common circular geometrical framework
What common(?) circular geometrical framework are you specifically referring to?

Sorry, I mean circular as far as the standard non-hyperbolic unit-circle analyses that do not use hyperbolic trig functions in their explanations of the science.

Alright, let me put it another way, my basic understanding of special relativity relies mainly on the popular conceptions of implementing the lorentze transformation in regards to relative motion. In my experience, I have not until recently been advised that I need to supplant this framework with one that analyzes and implements hyperbolics in this pursuit. Is this absolutley necessary, or can I just stick with my colloquial interpretation?

Like the others who have posted in this thread, I don't understand what the OP is referring to. StationZero, you're using terms like hyperbolic geometry in nonstandard ways, which makes it harder to figure out what you mean. You seem to have in mind two different ways of presenting SR, and you're asking whether they're both OK, or whether one is better than the other. Can you point us to some online sources that present these so that we can tell what you're referring to?

So, it seems to me that you are saying that
you are familiar with standard presentations in terms of relative-[dimensionless] velocities ($\beta$) and time-dilation factors ($\gamma$)
presentations involving "rapidity" ($\theta$), where $\beta=\tanh\theta$ and $\gamma=\cosh\theta$. (Note that, in his preface, Tevian Dray is describes this as "hyperbola geometry" [read as: "Minkowskian spacetime geometry, where the hyperbola plays the role of the locus of events equidistant from a given event, together with the Parallel Postulate"], which is not the same as "hyperbolic geometry", which violates the Parallel Postulate. The latter appears in special relativity when considering the space of velocities.)

In my opinion, the rapidity ("Minkowskian angle") approach allows one to more clearly draw analogies to your Euclidean intuition... and possibly make special relativity less mysterious. It will reveal the geometrical origin of the numerous "formulas" of special relativity.

These are just two different but equivalent ways of describing SR.

StationZero said:
Hi, I am new to the study of special relativity but think I understand it pretty well from the common circular geometrical framework. How important is it that I also understand it from the hyperbolic perspective and what would I gain over my current circular understanding?

You'll see that what are usually called "Lorentz boosts" are really just the analogue for rotations compared to the usual Euclidean framework.

In general, Euclidean rotations are generated by some object $i$ that squares to $-1$. Taking $e^{i \theta}$ generates (circular) sine and cosine through power series. $e^{i \theta} = \cos \theta + i \sin \theta$.

"Rotations" involving a timelike and spacelike direction in Minkowski space are generated by some object $\epsilon$ such that $\epsilon^2 = +1$ yet $\epsilon \neq 1$. A similar power series argument sowing that $e^{\epsilon \phi} = \cosh \phi + \epsilon \sinh \phi$ generates the hyperbolic trig functions. Just as $e^{i \theta}$ is at the heart of rotations in the 2d Euclidean plane, so is $e^{\epsilon \phi}$ at the heart of "rotations" in the 1+1d plane.

## 1. What is hyperbolic geometry in special relativity?

Hyperbolic geometry is a mathematical framework used to describe the geometry of spacetime in special relativity. It is based on the principles of non-Euclidean geometry, where the rules of traditional Euclidean geometry do not apply.

## 2. How does hyperbolic geometry differ from Euclidean geometry?

In Euclidean geometry, the sum of the angles of a triangle is always 180 degrees and parallel lines never meet. In hyperbolic geometry, the sum of the angles of a triangle is always less than 180 degrees and parallel lines can intersect at infinity.

## 3. Why is hyperbolic geometry important in special relativity?

Hyperbolic geometry is used in special relativity to explain the effects of time dilation and length contraction. It allows us to accurately describe the geometry of spacetime and understand how it is affected by the speed of an object.

## 4. Can hyperbolic geometry be visualized?

Yes, hyperbolic geometry can be visualized using various models, such as the Poincaré disk model or the hyperboloid model. However, these models may not accurately represent the true nature of hyperbolic geometry, as it is a non-Euclidean geometry.

## 5. How is hyperbolic geometry used in practical applications?

Hyperbolic geometry is used in various practical applications, such as GPS systems, which use hyperbolic trigonometry to determine a location based on the distance from multiple satellites. It is also used in the design of curved structures, such as bridges and buildings.

• Special and General Relativity
Replies
30
Views
2K
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
1K
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
36
Views
2K
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
2K
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
2K
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
2K
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
22
Views
1K
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
1K
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
36
Views
3K
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K