I am 14 years old and made a chemistry software

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around a 14-year-old student's development of a chemistry software application. Participants explore its features, usability, and potential improvements, touching on both theoretical and practical aspects of chemistry education.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • The original poster (OP) expresses a desire for feedback on their chemistry software, particularly regarding features and usability.
  • Some participants inquire about the software's functionality, specifically how it allows users to design molecules and whether it automates the bonding process.
  • One participant suggests that a good chemistry software should integrate both electronic interactions and geometric representations of chemical compounds.
  • Concerns are raised about the clarity of the software's presentation in a video, with one participant describing it as resembling a "marble playground" rather than a chemistry tool.
  • Suggestions are made for the OP to provide screenshots of the software to facilitate better discussion and feedback.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the software's effectiveness and clarity, with some appreciating its potential while others question its chemistry relevance. No consensus is reached on the software's capabilities or necessary improvements.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of detailed information about the software's features and user interface, as well as the absence of a direct link to the software for further examination.

QuantumEngine
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone. I am a 14 year old student and am truly fascinated by chemistry.
As I tried various software, they all had a very complicated UI (User Interface) and confused me a lot as a younger student. After searching a lot, I decided to make my own chemistry software. This is the final result after 5 months of work.

What could I add to the software?


Are there any very important things I should work on?

I have a pretty good understanding (I learn everything from internet, I already know the things we learn in class) on how it all works, so just comment everything you can think of!

PS: I am now working on better scaling. I totally forgot that there are things called "atom radii".

Edited by mentor
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ProfuselyQuarky
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Your software looks very good for a start. One thing we couldn't determine from the video was how it would be used by someone designing a molecule.

Do you just select atoms and then move them to create a molecule? Or does your program have the smarts to figure that out and bond them properly?

Have you looked at other programming systems like processing.org IDE to develop your application?

Lastly, we had to remove the link to steam as it looked a lot like an advertizement and we don't allow that on PF.
 
Is there a link to the software or video?
 
DrDu said:
Is there a link to the software or video?

Yes there was but we had to remove it due to PF rules. Basically it was a video on Steam showing a molecule being self-assembled on screen. We couldn't read any of its menus or really understand how the software assembled the molecule but we wanted to encourage the OP to talk about his project and discover new features that he could add.

Perhaps he could provide screenshots of the software instead uploaded to PF directly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
To understand chemistry, two ideas have to be combined: 1. the electronic interactions between atoms (and molecules) and 2. The geometry (3D shape) of the combinations of atoms we call "chemical compounds". I'd expect that a good software program would be able to help a student understand both of those topics. The geometry is more visual in nature, and is straightfoward (but learning about chiral isotopes is less intuitive, imho) to diplay graphically. The electronic stuff is harder, and any "textbook" (paper, electronic, or a program) has to decide on the depth of the treatment. Charge (electrons, protons,(neutrons), nuclei, atoms, ions) is usually first. Then comes the periodic table and the octet rule. While all this is being introduced, mass balance, charge balance of chemical reaction (equations) is being taught. Finally, if a little bit about the violations of the octet rule, polymers, as well as the (organic) chemistry of carbon and proteins and DNA is presented, you'll have a program which is good up to and past the high school level.
 
From the video I am not convinced there were any chemistry in the program - it looked just like a marble playground. Yes, marbles were marked with the element symbols.
 

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K